Ecosystem rationality is a philosophical discourse of thinking about the modern world and its future

Author:

Plyusnin Lev Vital'evich,Petrova Galina Ivanovna

Abstract

This article considers the search for a specific form of rational thinking about the future to be the subject of research. The object of research, in this regard, is rational thinking in the specifics of its essential characteristics and historical and philosophical forms of manifestation. Ecosystem rationality is proposed and substantiated as a relevant rationality as the methodological position. This study uses the following research methods: system analysis, which provides a holistic vision of a person from the perspective of his activities. This method proposes the concept of ecosystem rationality. System analysis is supplemented in the article by a comparison method, when different types of rationality (classical, non-classical and post-non-classical) are considered in the potential possibilities of their forms to think about the social reality of the future. Based on the generalization of literature, the article captures the tendency of the formation of ecosystem rationality as the form of modern post-non-classical rational thinking that meets the specifics of the study of modern social reality and its future manifestations. The concept is developed, the main characteristics are given, the specific purpose of ecosystem rationality is determined, which, while remaining scientific (that is, showing a rational path to truth), goes beyond the scope of science alone and, based on its epistemological criteria, offers rational ways of thinking about sociality in general. This rational thinking has the ability to be directed to the multi-vector and non-linear nature of social development, the facet nature of a theoretical view that can grasp the network state of the present as a harbinger of the future.

Publisher

Aurora Group, s.r.o

Subject

General Medicine

Reference30 articles.

1. Miller R. Being without existing: the futures community at a turning point? A comment on Jay Ogilvy’s ‘‘Facing the fold’’ // Foresight-The journal of future studies, strategic thinking and policy. – T. 13. – № 4. – 2011. – P. 24–34.

2. Godet M., Durance P. Scenario building: Uses and abuses // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. – T. 77. – №9. – 2010. – P. 1488-1492.

3. De Jouvenel H. An Invitation to Foresight / Transl. from Fr. Helen Fish. – Futuribles juillet. – 2004. – 88 p.

4. Gordon T. The Delphi Method // Futures Research Methodology – 3.0. – NY.: The Millennium Project. – 2009. – b.s.

5. Inayatullah, S. The Causal Layered Analysis (CLA) Reader: Theory and Case Studies of an Integrative and Transformative Methodology / Tamkang University Press. – Taipei. – 2004.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3