Author:
Plyusnin Lev Vital'evich,Petrova Galina Ivanovna
Abstract
This article considers the search for a specific form of rational thinking about the future to be the subject of research. The object of research, in this regard, is rational thinking in the specifics of its essential characteristics and historical and philosophical forms of manifestation. Ecosystem rationality is proposed and substantiated as a relevant rationality as the methodological position. This study uses the following research methods: system analysis, which provides a holistic vision of a person from the perspective of his activities. This method proposes the concept of ecosystem rationality. System analysis is supplemented in the article by a comparison method, when different types of rationality (classical, non-classical and post-non-classical) are considered in the potential possibilities of their forms to think about the social reality of the future. Based on the generalization of literature, the article captures the tendency of the formation of ecosystem rationality as the form of modern post-non-classical rational thinking that meets the specifics of the study of modern social reality and its future manifestations. The concept is developed, the main characteristics are given, the specific purpose of ecosystem rationality is determined, which, while remaining scientific (that is, showing a rational path to truth), goes beyond the scope of science alone and, based on its epistemological criteria, offers rational ways of thinking about sociality in general. This rational thinking has the ability to be directed to the multi-vector and non-linear nature of social development, the facet nature of a theoretical view that can grasp the network state of the present as a harbinger of the future.
Reference30 articles.
1. Miller R. Being without existing: the futures community at a turning point? A comment on Jay Ogilvy’s ‘‘Facing the fold’’ // Foresight-The journal of future studies, strategic thinking and policy. – T. 13. – № 4. – 2011. – P. 24–34.
2. Godet M., Durance P. Scenario building: Uses and abuses // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. – T. 77. – №9. – 2010. – P. 1488-1492.
3. De Jouvenel H. An Invitation to Foresight / Transl. from Fr. Helen Fish. – Futuribles juillet. – 2004. – 88 p.
4. Gordon T. The Delphi Method // Futures Research Methodology – 3.0. – NY.: The Millennium Project. – 2009. – b.s.
5. Inayatullah, S. The Causal Layered Analysis (CLA) Reader: Theory and Case Studies of an Integrative and Transformative Methodology / Tamkang University Press. – Taipei. – 2004.