Author:
Gluzdov Dmitry Viktorovich
Abstract
The object of philosophical research is artificial intelligence. The subject of the study covers the impact of the development of artificial intelligence on a person, on the formation and change of ideas about a person, his nature and essence. But in the study, the emphasis is on the contradictoriness of this impact. The philosophical and anthropological analysis of artificial intelligence is focused on understanding the impact of this technology through the phenomenon of man, human existence and his experience. The article is an attempt to study the problem from different positions, including the question of how to ensure control over the growing "consumption" of artificial intelligence in a variety of ways, as well as what can affect the development of a person himself and how current trends contribute to change or create social and cultural norms, such as the ideas of "roboethics" and ethical responsibility in the creation and use of intelligent machines. The presence of fragmented or insufficiently complete coverage in the study of the presented topic in the works of researchers allows us to set the task of formulating the problem and studying it. It is the need for a comprehensive study that is the idea that initiated this work, which boils down to an attempt to conduct a philosophical and anthropological analysis, identify the shortcomings of the existing situation and determine the prospects. From this position, in the process of research, no materials were found that consider the problem comprehensively, and on the other hand, combine the task of identifying the causes and foundations of these contradictions in order to analyze them from the standpoint of philosophical anthropology, which determines the novelty of the study.
Reference20 articles.
1. Mittelstadt B. Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI // Nature Machine Intelligence – Volume 1, November 2019 – p.501-507. DOI: 10.1038/s42256-019-0114-4
2. Afanas'evskaya A.A. Pravovoi status iskusstvennogo intellekta // Vestnik saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi yuridicheskoi akademii – 2021, №4 (141), – s.88-92 DOI: 10.24412/2227-7315-2021-4-88-92
3. Preparing for the Future of Artificial Intelligence. 2016. Washington, DC. Executive Office of the President National Science and Technology Council Committee on Technology – 2016 – [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/whitehouse_files/microsites/ostp/NSTC/preparing_for_the_future_of_ai.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 14.03.2023)
4. Shatkin M. A. Agentnost' tsifrovykh platform: tsennostnyi podkhod // Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya: Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika – 2022, №3 – s.293-297. DOI: 10.18500/1819-7671-2022-22-3-293-297
5. Leshchev S. V. Iskusstvenno-intellektual'naya agentnost' v prostranstve gumanitarnogo izmereniya // Sovremennye problemy gumanitarnykh i obshchestvennykh nauk – 2021 – s.65-68.