Author:
Lutsik Maksim Yur'evich,Drongo Anna Vladimirovna
Abstract
This article substantiates the relevance of studying the Self-concept as a phenomenon aimed at achieving Self-actualization and structurization of behavior. The question is raised about the prerequisites that allow a person to differentiate experience, thereby underlining the need to study the ontogenesis of the Self-concept as the foundation for the evaluative process that integrates the three gradually forming layers. This serves as the basis for formulating the definition of the Self-concept, and describing each of its layers (organismic, social, and conceptual). Their role in the experience evaluation process, as well as applicable to behavior, is explored. The boundaries are established between the layers and the phenomena introduced by K. Rogers; thus, the social layer is naturally introjective and essential. The subject of this research is the determination of each layer of possible disorders within ontogenesis, and relative to this, the risk of transition of the Self-concept from the process to the newly formed structure. Description is given to possibilities of application of this model in psychological practice. Firstly, it allows understanding the incongruity of the customer, as well as self-image of the psychologist in their non-empathic, but congruent responses. Secondly, this model structures the interaction in psychotherapy, helping to establish the typology of psychological disorder, as well as choose appropriate interventions remaining within the framework of humanistic methodology, without eclectic selection of the techniques. In conclusion, the authors reveal the potential of scientific study of the Self-concept model, which consists in understanding the customer and their incongruity. This model contributes to most accurate choice of techniques and methods, as well as means of interaction with the customer, depending on the dysfunction of the layer.
Reference43 articles.
1. Abdulin A.G., Tubmasova E.R. Obraz ya kak predmet issledovaniya v zarubezhnoi i otechestvennoi psikhologii Tekst nauchnoi stat'i po spetsial'nosti. Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Psikhologiya. 2012. № 6. 4-11 s.
2. Allakhverdov V. M. Soznanie kak paradoks. (Eksperimental'naya psikhologika) t. 1.SPb: «Izdatel'stvo DNK», 2000. — 528 s.
3. Arkhireeva T.V. Sistemnyi podkhod k ponimaniyu struktury Ya-kontseptsii i zakonomernostei ee razvitiya v detskom vozraste // Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya. 2008. №
4. S. 48–55. 4.Bek A. Kognitivnaya psikhoterapiya rasstroistv lichnosti. SPb.: Piter, 2002. 544 s.
5. Binsvanger L. Ekzistentsial'nyi analiz. Per. pod red. S. Rimskogo. M.: Institut Obshchegumanitarnykh Issledovanii. 2014. 272 s.