Trade, economic and sanctions wars: an attempt to theoretically differentiate the ideas in the context the international relations science

Author:

Mukhamadeev Dmitriy Viktorovich,Shevchenko Yan Nikolaevich

Abstract

The research purpose of this article is to attempt to differentiate the concepts and theoretical backgrounds of economic sanctions and trade wars as popular instruments of economic coercion. In the authors’ opinion, such differentiation is critically important for the conceptualization of economic sanctions as a foreign policy instrument kindling the interest of both specialists in international relations and the global and regional international politics practitioners. From a practical perspective, the interest in analyzing this issue is determined by the fact that over the past century, economic sanctions have become one of the key instruments of achieving a state’s foreign policy goals. They are mostly used by developed countries with extensive economic and technological capabilities (e.g. U.S.), which are striving for abatements of their less powerful partners regarding foreign and domestic policy issues. Yet another argument in favour of studying economic sanctions, trade wars and other instruments of economic coercion in the context of the theory of international relations is the possibility to shed more light on the nature of power as the most significant concept of modern political science. A detailed analysis of theoretical discussions about the phenomenon of trade and economic wars compared with economic sanctions allows the authors to outline a set of fundamental differences between these phenomena in the context of modern economic diplomacy.   

Publisher

Aurora Group, s.r.o

Reference23 articles.

1. Aristofan. Akharnyane // Aristofan. Komedii; Fragmenty /Per. Adr. Piotrovskogo; Izd. podgot. V. N. Yarkho; Otv. red. M. L. Gasparov. M.: Ladomir, Nauka, 2008. 1033 s. (Seriya «Literaturnye pamyatniki»)

2. Baryshnikov D. N. Diplomatiya v global'nuyu epokhu: teoriya i praktika // Dialog: politika, pravo, ekonomika. 2017. № 4 (7). S. 20–26.

3. Gutorov V. A. Nasledie I. Kanta v strukture sovremennoi politicheskoi filosofii // Upravlencheskoe konsul'tirovanie. Aktual'nye problemy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal'nogo upravleniya. 2011. № 1 (41). S. 218–227.

4. Gutorov V. A., Shirinyants A. A. Terrorizm kak teoreticheskaya i istoricheskaya problema: nekotorye aspekty interpretatsii // Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. 2017. № 3. S. 30–54. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2017.03.03

5. Zakon RF ot 21.05.1993 N 5003-1 (red. ot 01.05.2019) "O tamozhennom tarife". URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_1995/ (data obrashcheniya: 19.08.2019).

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3