Author:
Salikov Marat Sabiryanovich
Abstract
The constitutional regulation of the institution of public authority, taking into account the amendments to the Basic Law in 2020, revealed a number of contradictions with the current legislation adopted subsequently. The levels (international, federal state, regional state and municipal) of the implementation of public power are highlighted and considered, as well as some problems related to both the composition of a unified system of public authorities and the possible negative consequences of the trend of its centralization. The necessity of responding to and including modern technological challenges in the sphere of activity of public authorities is shown. The subject of the study is the institution of public authority, the composition of a unified system of public authorities, legal relations developing within this system, as well as the impact of adopted constitutional amendments and modern challenges (globalization, digitalization, Internet technologies, etc.) on the transformation of the institution in question. The aim of the work is to identify contradictions in the legal regulation of the institution of public power, identify the levels and features of its implementation, and develop proposals to improve the effectiveness of the unified system of public power without prejudice to the institutions of federalism and local government. Material and methods. The study used the current Constitution of the Russian Federation, relevant federal legislation, as well as judicial practice - decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. The general (methods of analysis and synthesis, deduction and induction, system-structural method) and private (formal legal, comparative legal methods, method of generalization of judicial practice) methods of scientific cognition are used. The trend of increasing centralization of public power that has manifested itself at present can be justified to some extent by the current situation associated with unprecedented external pressure and the need for a certain consolidation of society and the state in the person of public authorities. At the same time, the state is called upon to distribute functions between levels of public authority in such a way that the rights of local self-government, as well as the principles of federalism and subsidiarity, which are either directly enshrined in the Basic Law or follow from its content, are strictly respected. The latter assumes the priority right of territorial units of the lowest possible level, with sufficient potential to solve specific tasks, to exercise powers on specific subjects of competence.
Reference22 articles.
1. Markova E. N. Obshchestvennaya i (ili) publichnaya vlast': problema sootnosheniya v kontekste konstitutsionnoi reformy 2020 g. // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2021. № 12. S. 26-28.
2. Chebotarev G. N. Konstitutsionno-pravovye mekhanizmy formirovaniya edinoi sistemy publichnoi vlasti v Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Rossiiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal.-2020.-№ 6(135). S. 9-17.
3. Chertkov A. N. Publichnaya vlast' v obnovlennoi Konstitutsii. Tandemu gosudarstvennoi i munitsipal'noi vlastei neobkhodim triumvirat s vlast'yu grazhdanskogo obshchestva // https://www.advgazeta.ru/mneniya/publichnaya-vlast-v-obnovlennoy-konstitutsii/ (data obrashcheniya: 12.11.2023).
4. Chertkov A. N. Publichnaya vlast': sostav, edinstvo i sushchnost' vzaimodeistviya // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2020. № 10. S. 19-23.
5. Lebedev V. A. Organy gosudarstvennoi vlasti sub''ektov RF kak element edinoi sistemy publichnoi vlasti sovremennoi Rossii // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2021. № 8. S. 43.