Information Technologies and the Collective Subject of Law

Author:

Sukharev Mikhail Valentinovich

Abstract

The article deals with the problem of a collective subject in the conditions of the spread of digital communications. The classification of collective subjects is a definite problem for legal science. There are social, political, and economic collective entities. A collective entity exists under the following conditions. Firstly, there should be a possibility of constant communication between the members of the team. Secondly, the team conducts one or more types of common activities. Thirdly, the team members participate in the development of directions and ways of future activities. Fourth, they can directly or indirectly influence decisions on the choice of one of the proposed options for future activities. The spread of digital communications significantly increases the connectivity of large teams. There is a possibility of existence of geographically distributed collective entities, whose members are located in different countries. The research method is based on the analysis of changes in the ways of communication between individuals who make up a collective subject. Digital networks allow for discussions (including those protected by cryptography), voting, foresight, the use of digital signatures, and automatic logging of all communication. Compared to telephone communication, digital communications allow the simultaneous participation of hundreds of people (collective chat). The speed of e-mail transmission is thousands of times higher than the speed of written messages. The new tools allow for video conferences with demonstrations of graphic and tabular materials. Voting using secure protocols and digital signatures is possible. There are decision support systems, computer models (digital doubles) of objects that need to be managed to make decisions. All this leads to a significant change in the quality and effectiveness of collective subjects. New types of collective actors (virtual communities) are emerging, which ultimately influence events in the real world. Legal science needs to start studying the processes of digitalization and comprehend their theoretical significance for jurisprudence.

Publisher

Aurora Group, s.r.o

Subject

General Medicine

Reference21 articles.

1. Samylov I.V. Ponyatie i sistema kollektivnykh sub''ektov prava // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki. 2009. Vypusk 4 (6). S. 25-32.

2. Velieva D.S. Kollektivnye sub''ekty konstitutsionnykh prav // Vestnik Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi yuridicheskoi akademii. 2013. №4 (93). S. 205-208.

3. Kasavin I.T. Kollektivnyi sub''ekt kak predmet epistemologicheskogo analiza / I. T. Kasavin // Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. 2015. T.46, № 4. S. 5-18.

4. McCarthy D.E. Knowledge as Culture: The New Sociology of Knowledge. New York&London: Routledge, 1996.

5. Viale R. Methodological Cognitivism. Vol. 1: Mind, Rationality, and Society. Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York: Springer, 2012. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-24743-9

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3