Possible ways to improve the institution of conciliation procedures in civil proceedings

Author:

Naryshkina Svetlana Yur'evna

Abstract

The subject of the research in this article is the norms of procedural law that characterize such a special segment of relations within the framework of domestic civil proceedings as the institution of conciliation procedures. The author in the article analyzes the legislative provisions that formulate the construction of the concept of conciliation procedures, speaking about its legislative "defects". The problem is also aggravated by the lack of unity of views on its explanation in the scientific community, which necessitates a separate study focusing exclusively on the definitive apparatus. The problematic field of Russian legislation is also the diversity of types of conciliation procedures, as well as the specifics of their implementation in the activities of subjects of disputed legal relations in the context of the legal conflict that has arisen, to which the author pays special attention in view of their multifaceted significance and role in judicial practical application, defining such basic legal parameters as "alternative dispute resolution", mediation, settlement agreement, judicial reconciliation, etc. To conduct the research, the author used a methodology that includes an analytical review of the normative legal and scientific literature on the subject of research, synthesis and generalization of the collected data, the formation of optimal parameters for the application of the model of conciliation procedures in civil and arbitration proceedings. The result of the work done was the original author's proposals and recommendations of the legislative "revision" of procedural legislation, forming innovations in law. In particular, in the form of draft articles, an updated definition of conciliation procedures is proposed, their characteristic features are highlighted, their functional significance is determined, their specific types are isolated. The author's vision of the updated Strategy of applying the institute of conciliation procedures in the realities of Russian legal relations is formulated. In their entirety, the components of the novelty of the article.

Publisher

Aurora Group, s.r.o

Subject

General Medicine

Reference15 articles.

1. Konstitutsiya RF 12 dekabrya 1993 goda (s uchetom popravok, vnesennykh Zakonami RF o popravkakh k Konstitutsii RF ot 30 dekabrya 2008 № 6-FKZ, ot 30 dekabrya 2008 № 7-FKZ, ot 05 fevralya 2014 № 2-FKZ, ot 21 iyulya 2014 № 11-FKZ, s izmeneniyami, odobrennymi v khode obshcherossiiskogo golosovaniya 01.07.2020) // [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://www.pravo.gov.ru (data obrashcheniya 05.06.2023).

2. Grazhdanskii protsessual'nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 14.11.2002 № 138-FZ (red. ot 14.04.2023, s izm. ot 26.04.2023) (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 28.04.2023) // [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://www.pravo.gov.ru (data obrashcheniya 05.06.2023).

3. Arbitrazhnyi protsessual'nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 24.07.2002 № 95-FZ (red. ot 18.03.2023) // [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://www.pravo.gov.ru (data obrashcheniya 05.06.2023).

4. Avtonomova M.V., Budyakov A.A., Kharlamova E.A. Rol' i mesto instituta primireniya i primiritel'nykh protsedur v grazhdanskom protsesse // Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika. 2023. № 4 (220). S. 213-216.

5. Brazhnikova A.I. Rol' primiritel'nykh protsedur v pravovom konflikte // Biznes i obshchestvo. 2022. № 3 (35). S. 34-36.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3