A Principled Approach to the Reconciliation Procedure: Theory and Practice

Author:

Batchaeva Aminat Alkhazovna

Abstract

The article examines the problems of regulation and implementation of the provisions of the law on reconciliation in criminal cases. The interrelation of the norms of the institute of reconciliation with a number of principles of criminal procedure law is substantiated and it is concluded that the institution of reconciliation of the parties does not fully comply with the purpose of criminal proceedings and its principles such as the protection of human and civil rights and freedoms and the presumption of innocence. In this regard, the article proposes changes that it is advisable to make to the criminal and criminal procedure law, as well as to the guidance clarifications of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation to eliminate such contradictions. So we consider it necessary: in the text of the Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated 27.06.2013 N 19, to exclude the mention of the established guilt of the person against whom the criminal case is terminated in accordance with Article 25 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, and also to reflect the judgment that it is unacceptable for the law enforcement officer to allow formulations in the text of the resolution on the termination of the criminal case, indicating the proof of guilt the person against whom the decision to terminate the criminal case is made; from Articles 25, 213 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, it is necessary to exclude an indication of the possibility of reconciliation with the suspect; part 2 of Article 42 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation should be supplemented with paragraph 4.1 of the following content "to reconcile with the suspect, the accused person in accordance with the procedure established by Article 25 of this Code"; paragraph 15 Part 4 of Article 47 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation should be supplemented with the wording explaining to the accused the right to reconciliation in accordance with the procedure provided for in Article 25 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation.

Publisher

Aurora Group, s.r.o

Subject

General Medicine

Reference29 articles.

1. Batchaeva A.A. O pravopreemstve v primirenii po ugolovnym delam chastnogo obvineniya // Pravo i politika. 2021. № 11. S. 33 – 42.

2. Belousova E.A. Ob obshchem poryadke prekrashcheniya ugolovnogo presledovaniya// Leningradskii yuridicheskii zhurnal. 2010. № 4 (22). S. 98-107. S. 104-105;

3. Bol'shakov I.V. Prekrashchenie ugolovnogo dela (ugolovnogo presledovaniya) publichnogo obvineniya v svyazi s primireniem storon v sovremennom ugolovnom protsesse: avtoref. dis… kand. yurid. nauk. Kemerovo, 2007. 33. s. S. 8; S. 9.

4. Vasil'eva E.G. Pravovye i teoreticheskie problemy prekrashcheniya ugolovnogo presledovaniya i proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu. M., 2006. S. 210.

5. Galimova M.A. Prekrashchenie ugolovnogo dela (ugolovnogo presledovaniya) v svyazi s primireniem storon. Krasnoyarsk, 2021. 100 s. S. 55-56;

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3