Author:
Anikin Daniil Aleksandrovich,Konakov Dmitrii Nikolaevich
Abstract
The article examines the concept of securitization from the point of view of social philosophy, determines the need to abandon objectivism or extreme constructivism in the analysis of this concept. The prerequisites for the formation of the security value are analyzed, as well as the main forms of securitization common in modern risk society, in particular, military, political, social, economic and environmental securitization. Special emphasis is placed on the study of the social conditions for the implementation of the securitization strategy. The object of the study is the phenomenon of securitization as a socio-philosophical phenomenon, and the subject of the study is mnemonic securitization as a new form of addressing the problem of security in a modern risk society. The author introduces the concept of securitization as a social practice based on the willingness of the community to perceive a certain natural or social phenomenon as an objectively existing threat. Mnemonic securitization is considered as a fundamentally new type of securitization, which presupposes the desire to present symbolically significant images of the past as an object of influence from ideological opponents. A special contribution to the problems of research is determined by the identification of links between the processes of transformation of collective communities and the emergence of risks of collective identity, which is expressed in the formation of ideas about the need for ontological security and the delegation of powers to protect this form of security by political actors, primarily the state.
Subject
General Materials Science
Reference14 articles.
1. Agamben D. Homo sacer. Chrezvychainoe polozhenie. M.: Izd-vo «Evropa», 2011. 196 S.
2. Akopov S., Proshina E. «Neokonchennoe priklyuchenie" obraza vraga: ot teorii sek'yuritizatsii do kontseptsii "dalekikh mestnykh" // Vlast'. 2011. № 1. S. 11-18.
3. Bek U. Kosmopoliticheskoe mirovozzrenie. — M.: Tsentr issledovanii postindustrial'nogo obshchestva, 2008. — 336 s.
4. Bek U. Obshchestvo riska. Na puti k drugomu modernu. / Per. s nem. V. Sedel'nika i N. Fedorovoi; Posl. A. Filippova. — M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2000. 320 c.
5. Miller A.I. Rost znachimosti institutsional'nogo faktora v politike pamyati – prichiny i posledstviya // Politiya: Analiz. Khronika. Prognoz. – 2019. – № 3 (94). – C. 87–102.