Hofstede's Power Distance Cultural Dimension and its Representation in Historical Documents of Russia in the 16th-20th Centuries

Author:

Danilova Anna Gennadievna,Mitina Ol'ga Valentinovna

Abstract

Based on the theory of basic cultural dimensions by G. Hofstede, the value orientations presented in the texts of Russian and Soviet power discourse are analyzed. Based on the behavioral characteristics given by Hofstede (1980) to characterize cultures with high and low indicators in basic dimensions, a content analysis of the texts of Russian power discourse for the XVI-XX centuries, including state acts, legal documents, chronicles, judicial records, official and private correspondence, was carried out. A comparison of the hierarchical and power value orientations of Russian culture, identified by the method of content analysis, and the conclusions of historical studies of social and cultural trends of the corresponding period. A reproducible factor structure consisting of 16-20 factors and corresponding to the sub-dimensional structure of the basic value orientations of culture, theoretically predicted and empirically identified in foreign studies of value orientations, is obtained. Aspects of the basic dimensions of culture according to G. Hofstede, having different time dynamics, are highlighted. The obtained aspects of the basic dimension of the power distance are analyzed. Graphs of the dynamics of value orientations with generalization over 25 years are constructed. The correspondence of the dynamics revealed by the content analysis of the power discourse to the actual historical trends is shown. The conclusion is made about the applicability of the texts of the power discourse for the analysis of the historical dynamics of value orientations.

Publisher

Aurora Group, s.r.o

Subject

General Materials Science

Reference50 articles.

1. Moodie D. W. Content Analysis: A Method for Historical Geography//Area, 1971, Vol. 3, No. 3. Rp. 146-149

2. Neimark M. How to use content analysis in historical research// Accounting Historians Notebook, 1983, Vol. 6: No. 2, Article 1.

3. Priborovich A. A. Kontent-analiz – forma istoricheskogo issledovaniya // Rol' lichnosti v istorii: real'nost' i problemy izucheniya: nauch. sb. (po materialam 1-i Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi Internet-konferentsii) / redkol. V. N. Sidortsov (otv. red.) [i dr.]. – Minsk, BGU.-2011. S. 153–159.

4. Borodkin L. I., Vladimirov V. N. — Tsifrovye tekhnologii i resursy v konkretno-istoricheskikh issledovaniyakh: diskussii i opyt // Istoricheskaya informatika. – 2019, № 2. S. 1-8.

5. Werner M. Qualitative Content Analysis and Historical Research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung // Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2020, No. 21(1).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3