Criteria and factors of digital activism effectiveness: expert assessments

Author:

Abramova Sofya Borisovna

Abstract

This article examines the problem of the effectiveness of digital participation, and sets the goal of defining criteria for measuring it and identifying factors that act as barriers to the implementation and achievement of full results of digital civic initiatives. The diversity of understanding efficiency is revealed in the context of the specifics of social processes and digital communications. It is shown that in the Russian and foreign scientific sociological field has not been formed a wide and substantiated experience and methodology for studying the effectiveness of online forms of civic activism, which determines the relevance of the research topic, as well as the need for a methodological solution to the problem. The empirical basis of the study is a survey of 16 experts in the field of digital activism from 8 federal districts of the Russian Federation conducted. The novelty of the work is related to the typology of the criteria for the effectiveness of digital participation, based on the analysis of expert assessments: effectiveness as effectiveness, effectiveness as the level of activity and involvement of citizens, effectiveness as development (creativity and innovation), social effectiveness and social effects, effectiveness as dialogue and the development of social partnership. Within each type there is a detailed description of the indicators and quotes from experts characterizing this performance indicator. It has been recorded that experts perceive the situation with the development of digital civic participation as dual, in which positive trends collide with barrier factors and conditions. Key factors-barriers have been identified: negative ideas about the effectiveness of digital activism, low awareness of the population about digital technologies and opportunities for participation, formalization and simulation of citizen activity, etc. Taking into account the results obtained, the prospects for future research are related to the study of the social effects of digital activism, identifying criteria for effectiveness in the assessments of the initiators and participants of activism, government officials and the media.

Publisher

Aurora Group, s.r.o

Subject

General Materials Science

Reference17 articles.

1. Abramova S. B., Antonova N. L. Effektivnost' tsifrovoi partisipatsii molodezhi kak formy grazhdanskoi aktivnosti (pilotnoe issledovanie v Ekaterinburge) // Mir nauki. Sotsiologiya, filologiya, kul'turologiya. 2022. T. 13, № 3. URL: https://sfk-mn.ru/PDF/12SCSK322.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 18.11.2023).

2. Ermolaeva P., Basheva O., Ermolaeva Yu. «Mezhdu virtual'nym i fizicheskim»: kontury tsifrovogo aktivizma ekologicheskikh nekommercheskikh organizatsii Rossii // Zhurnal issledovanii sotsial'noi politiki. 2023. T. 21, № 2. S. 241–258. DOI: 10.17323/727-0634-2023-21-2-241-258.

3. Kuznetsova S. V. Problemy otsenki sotsial'nykh rezul'tatov i effektov deyatel'nosti sotsial'nykh predpriyatii // Moskovskii ekonomicheskii zhurnal. 2021. №3. S. 572-585. DOI: 10.24412/2413-046Kh-2021-10185.

4. Nevskaya T. A. Grazhdanskii aktivizm kak resurs politicheskogo administrirovaniya mediaprostranstva: rossiiskii i mezhdunarodnyi opyt // Sotsiodinamika. 2020. № 9. S.18–29. DOI: 10.25136/2409-7144.2020.9.33869.

5. Nyatina N. V., Grigorik N. N., Molchanov A. A. Tsifrovizatsiya sotsial'no-politicheskogo vzaimodeistviya: mobilizatsiya real'noi i virtual'noi kommunikatsii. Virtual'naya kommunikatsiya i sotsial'nye seti. 2023. T. 2. № 3. S. 167–174. DOI: 10.21603/2782-4799-2023-2-3-167-174.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3