The sanctions regimes of Germany and Great Britain in the field of international scientific cooperation with the participation of Russia: the political and legal nature and consequences

Author:

Shugurov Mark Vladimirovich,Pechatnova Yuliya Vadimovna

Abstract

The article undertakes a political and legal analysis of the complications in the scientific and technical cooperation of Russia with Germany and Great Britain. Particular attention is paid to the identification of the subjects of the introduction of anti-Russian sanctions regimes, as well as the substantive characteristics of the varieties of unilateral restrictive measures in the field of scientific cooperation. The authors dwell in detail on the disclosure of the correlation of legal and asiological aspects of the introduction of sanctions restrictions. It was important to compare the sanctions regimes of Germany and Great Britain in terms of the dynamics, subject composition and content of unilateral restrictive measures. The study proves that the invasion of foreign policy interests by Germany and Great Britain into bilateral international scientific cooperation means the decline of the former era of scientific diplomacy. The main conclusion of the work is the provision that the suspension of cooperation with Russia in the scientific field does not result from violations by our country of its legal obligations in the field of bilateral international scientific cooperation. The gap in cooperation at the institutional level is supplemented by the assumption of informal scientific communication. But overly politicized demands for the continuation of this cooperation violate the right to freedom of scientific research. The novelty of the study lies in the fact that for the first time in the framework of the subject area of research of scientific sanctions in a comparative way and in the context of modern theoretical developments, the content of the anti-Russian sanctions regimes of Germany and Great Britain, which are among Russia's main partners in the field of international scientific and technical cooperation, was revealed.

Publisher

Aurora Group, s.r.o

Subject

General Medicine

Reference28 articles.

1. Aleksandrova D.E. Odnostoronnie sanktsii v kontekste sovremennogo mezhdunarodnogo prava // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. 2023. № 3. S. 21–29. doi: 10.25136/2644-5514.2023.3.38737

2. Kartskhiya A.A. Rezhim sanktsii: pravovoi aspekt publichnogo i chastnopravovogo regulirovaniya // Monitoring pravoprimeneniya. 2022. № 2. S. 2–10.

3. Afontsev S. Lovushka sanktsionnogo rezhima  // Politika sanktsii: tseli, strategii, instrumenty: khrestomatiya. Izd. 2-e, pererab. i dop. / sost. I.N. Timofeev, V.A. Morozov, Yu.S. Timofeeva. M.: Rossiiskii sovet po mezhdunarodnym delam, 2022. S. 47–53.

4. Lee J., Portela C. Evaluating the success of international sanctions: a new research agenda // "em"Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internaciona"/em"ls"i"."/i" 2020. Issue 125. P. 39–60. doi: doi.org/10.24241/rcai.2020.125.2.39/en

5. Urbanksi K. The European Union and international sanctions. A Model of emerging actorness. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020. 192 p.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3