OECD National Contact Points as the effective means for human rights protection from the activities of transnational corporations

Author:

Sinyavskiy Alexey

Abstract

This article is dedicated to the analysis of extrajudicial mechanisms of consideration of complaints – OECD National Contact Points. The object of this research is the activity of OECD National Contact Points, while the subject of is the dispute resolution procedure therein. The goal of this research consist in carrying out efficiency assessment of OECD National Contact Points as legal remedy for the persons suffered from the activity of transnational corporations. The work consists of the three parts. The first part provides brief description of the activity of transnational corporations and the concept of corporate liability for violation of human rights. The second part is dedicated to the analysis of dispute resolution procedure within the National Contact Points. The third part analyzes the effectiveness of National Contact Points as legal remedy. The author comes to the following conclusions and recommendations: due to the differences in the structure, financing, and human resources, National Contact Points of certain countries appear to be more effective than of the others. The effectiveness largely depends on the level of economic development of the OECD member-state, financing, and competences of mediators. Therefore, the National Contact Points of the developed countries represent the effective legal remedy, while in the developing countries, the parties suffered from entrepreneurial activity face barriers that impede exercising their right to effective legal remedy. The set of organizational and legal measures cans serve as the solution to the existing problems. Namely, the conclusion of bilateral agreements between the developed and developing countries on rendering legal aid and exchange of mediators is essential. The author also recommends establishing corporate liability on the domestic levee in form of fines and other sanctions for refusal of transnational corporation to comply with the decision of the National Contact Points. The provision with recommendation on consolidation of such liability should be introduced into OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises.

Publisher

Aurora Group, s.r.o

Reference37 articles.

1. Levashenko A., Ermokhin I. 2019. Otsenka perspektiv uluchsheniya investitsionnogo klimata v Rossii na osnove vnedreniya standartov OESR po otvetstvennomu vedeniyu biznesa. 53 c. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3353077

2. Shumilov V. M. 2014. Mezhdunarodnoe ekonomicheskoe pravo. M.: VAVT – 287 s.

3. Bauman-Pauly D. 2017. Business and Human Rights. From Principles to Practice // Kristen Genovese. Access to remedy: non-judicial grievance mechanisms – Taylor and Francis: Routledge.

4. Bernaz N. 2017. Business and human rights: history, law and policy: bridging the accountability gap. Abington, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge.

5. “Final Statement on the Request for Review regarding the Operation of China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd., at the Copper Polymetallic Mine at the Gyama Valley, Tibet Autonomous Region,” URL: http://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accordscommerciaux/ncp-pcn/statement-gyama-valley.aspx?lang=eng. The company is listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3