Medical errors — causes and contradictions

Author:

Makhambetchin M. M.1ORCID,Lokhvitskiy S. V.2ORCID,Turgunov Y. M.2ORCID,Shakeyev K. T.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Scientifi c and Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics of the Republic of Kazakhstan

2. Karaganda Medical University

Abstract

Studying and improving the theory of errors of doctors has always been important, and today it has become especially relevant.The article lists the main provisions of the advanced version of the theory of errors of doctors. The main content of the articleis devoted to four important aspects of the problem of physician errors. The article states the main contradiction of the problemof errors in medicine. The structure of general objective and subjective causes of medical errors is shown. The main optionsfor doctors to experience errors that complicate doctors’ mutual understanding in this problem are formulated. For the fi rsttime, the reasons for the denial of errors by doctors are summarized. These aspects and conclusions on them are the result ofan analysis of publications on the problem of errors in medicine, repeated discussions of the problem on professional medicalsites. The content of these aspects was based on its own material on error analysis and observation from practice. The aboveaspects and their conclusions need not so much to be confi rmed by special studies, but rather to refl ect on their role and placein the problem of errors. The general objective and subjective reasons for the occurrence of medical errors are shown inconnection with their possible "guilt". Lack of experience is presented as the most common cause of medical errors. Variousoption for doctors to experience errors are presented as a reason that makes it diffi cult for doctors to understand this problem.

Publisher

Medical Informational Agency Publishers

Subject

General Medicine

Reference26 articles.

1. Doskin V.A., Derinova E.A., Kartoeva R.A., Sokolova M.S. Medical errors and confl icts in clinical practice. Klinicheskaja medicina. 2014;4:57--63. (in Russian)

2. Zasypkina E.V., Katrunov V.A., Kuznecova M.N. On the issue of medical errors: methodology and criteria for determination. Bjulleten’ medicinskikh Internet-konferencij. 2016; 6(1):243-247. (in Russian)

3. Dimov A.S. Physician’s anticredo from the standpoint of errologia medica: between theory and practice. Klinicheskaya medicina.2016;8:631-638. DOI:10.18821/0023-2149-2016-94-8-631-638 (in Russian)

4. Suchkova T.E., Suchkov A.V. On the terminological ambiguity of the concept of «medical error». Scientifi c-methodical electronic journal «Concept». 2017;31:996–1000. URL: http://e-koncept.ru/2017/970214. htm. (in Russian)

5. Pigolkin Ju.I., Morozov Ju.E., Globa I.V. Com petence of a doctor and a lawyer in establishing a medi cal error. Aktual’nye problemy mediciny i biologii. 2018;2:58–59. doi: 10.24411/2587-4926-2018-10018 (in Russan)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3