Affiliation:
1. Ryazan State Medical University
Abstract
Background: due to the emergence of new technologies for analyzing of EEG signal, many new researches in this field have appeared in recent years, including those investigating EEG parameters of schizophrenia. The aim: this publication provides an overview of actual studies on the possibilities of using the assessment of resting state EEG recordings in the diagnostics and prognosis of schizophrenia course. Material and methods: publications were selected in eLibrary, PubMed, Google Scholar and CNKI databases using the keywords: “psychosis”, “schizophrenia”, “EEG”, “resting state”. Methodologically, the atricle is a narrative literature review. Thirty-three sources were selected for analysis. Discussion and conclusion: according to the data available to present date qualitive and quantitative assessment of resting EEGs cannot be used for the instrumental diagnosis of schizophrenia because the most commonly detected increase in the proportion of slow-wave activity is seen in a several disorders. However, some quantitative spectral estimates of resting state EEG could be used to identify poor prognosis response to antipsychotic therapy, as well as for objective assessment of the dynamics of the mental state. Estimation of the power of slow resting EEG rhythms and other methods of assessing the connectivity of different neural networks could be considered as potential markers of the presence of a specific endophenotype. Modern digital technologies, including machine learning and artificial intelligence algorithms, make it possible to identify resting EEG of the schizophrenic patients from healthy controls with accuracy, sensitivity and specificity more than 95%. EEG microstates assessment, which can be used to assess the functioning of large neuronal ensembles, are one of the methods for detecting the endophenotype of schizophrenia.
Publisher
Medical Informational Agency Publishers
Reference38 articles.
1. Kichuk IV, Solovyova NV, Makarova EV, Mitrofanov AA, Lusnikova IV, Rusalova MN, Chausova SV. Perspectives of EEG computer analysis in diagnosis of schizophrenia. Social and Clinical Psychiatry. 2020;30(3):73–78. (In Russ.).
2. Shatrova NV, Sychov VV. The sexual features of bioelectrical activity of human brain on the base of spectral analysis of electroencephalography in a process of high-frequency (20 Hz) photostimulation. I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald. 2016;24(1):64–67. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17816/PAVLOVJ2016164-67
3. Zorin RA, Medvedeva YI, Kurepina IS, Lapkin MM, Zhadnov VA. Distribution of physiological resources and effectivity of purposeful activity of patients with epilepsy. I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald. 2018;26(3):369–379. (In Russ.). doi: 10.23888/PAVLOVJ2018263369-379
4. Fedotov IА, Quattrone D, Shustov DI. Substance-induced psychosis and schizophrenia: the interaction point. I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald. 2020;28(4):593–604. (In Russ.). doi: 10.23888/PAVLOVJ2020284593-604
5. Zubov DS, Dorofeikova MV, Petrova NN, Dorofeykov VV, Ivanov MV. Changes in levels of neuromarkers and cognitive functioning of patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. V.M. Bekhterev review of psychiatry and medical psychology. 2016;3:51–56. (In Russ.).