Affiliation:
1. KONYA UNIVERSITY, AHMET KELEŞOĞLU FACULTY OF EDUCATION
2. AFYON KOCATEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ
3. KONYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, EĞİTİM BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ
Abstract
This study aims to examine the communication skills of students with special abilities in terms of different variables (gender, parents' education status, number of siblings, birth order, enjoying to participate in group activities, and parents' occupational groups). The descriptive survey model was taken as a basis for the study. The study participants consisted of 160 gifted students studying at the Science and Art Center. The data were obtained by using the Communication Scale. In the analysis of the data, descriptive statistics and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) were used. According to the results of the research, the scores of male students on the communication scale are significantly higher than the average score of female students. While there was a significant difference in the mean of communication scores according to the variables of the education status of the mother and father and the profession of the father, no significant difference was found according to the other variables. The results indicate that in determining and developing the communication skills levels of students with special abilities, variables such as the gender of the students and the educational status of their parents should be taken into consideration.
Publisher
Electronic Journal of Social Sciences
Reference45 articles.
1. Referans1
Alfarah, Y. F. (2013). Communication Skills among Gifted Students in Jordan. Gifted and Talented International, 28(1-2), 255–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2013.11678420
2. Referans2
Altıntaş, G. (2006). Liseli ergenlerin kişiler arası iletişim becerileri ile akılcı olmayan inançları arasındaki ilişkinin bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi.
3. Referans3
Altunok, E. B. (2019). Anne baba tutumları ile okul öncesi dönem çocuklarının iletişim becerileri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Doktora tezi, Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi.
4. Referans4
Barkman, S., Machtmes, K. (2002). Communication evaluation scale. CYFAR project, 2012-18.
5. Referans5
Berger, C.R., ve Chaffee, S.H. (1987). Handbook of communication science. Sage.