Author:
Kim Minha,Stroever Stephanie,Aploks Krist,Ostapenko Alexander,Dong Xiang Da,Seshadri Ramanathan
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Gallbladder cancer is the most common malignancy of the biliary tract. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has improved overall survival by enabling R0 resection. Currently, there is no consensus of guidelines for neoadjuvant therapy in gallbladder cancer. As investigations continue to analyze the regimen and benefit of NACT for ongoing care of gallbladder cancer patients, we examined American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database to determine if there was higher morbidity among the neoadjuvant group within the 30-day post-operative period. We hypothesized patients who underwent NACT were more likely to have higher post-operative morbidity.
AIM
To investigate the 30-day post-operative morbidity outcomes between patients who received NACT and underwent surgery and patients who only had surgery.
METHODS
A retrospective analysis of the targeted hepatectomy NSQIP data between 2015 and 2019 was performed to determine if NACT in gallbladder cancer increased the risk for post-operative morbidity (bile leak, infection rate, rate of converting to open surgery, etc. ) compared to the group who only had surgery. To calculate the odds ratio for the primary and secondary outcomes, a crude logistic regression was performed.
RESULTS
Of the 452 patients, 52 patients received NACT prior to surgery. There were no statistically significant differences in the odds of morbidity between the two groups, including bile leak [odds ratio (OR), 0.69; 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 0.16-2.10; P = 0.55], superficial wound infection (OR, 0.58; 95%CI: 0.03-3.02; P = 0.61), and organ space wound infection (OR, 0.63; 95%CI: 0.18-1.63; P = 0.61).
CONCLUSION
There was no significant difference in the risk of 30-day post-operative morbidity between the NACT and surgery group and the surgery only group.
Publisher
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.