Abstract
We are naturally disposed to believe of ourselves and others that we are free: that what we do is often and to a considerable extent ‘up to us’ via the exercise of a power of choice to do or to refrain from doing one or more alternatives of which we are aware. In this article, I probe thesource and epistemic justification of our ‘freedom belief’. I propose an account that (unlike most) does not lean heavily on our first-personal experience of choice and action, and instead regards freedom belief as a priori justified. I will then consider possible replies available toincompatibilists to the contention made by some compatibilists that the ‘privileged’ epistemic status of freedom belief (which my account endorses) supports a minimalist, and therefore compatibilist view of the nature of freedom itself.
Publisher
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences University of Rijeka
Reference24 articles.
1. Bayne, T. 2016. Free Will and the Phenomenology of Agency. In The Routledge Companion to Free Will, eds. Timpe, Griffith, and Levy, 633-644. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
2. Boyd, R. 1999. Homeostasis, Species, and Higher Taxa. In Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, ed. R. A. Wilson, 141–185. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
3. Clarke, R. 2003. Libertarian Accounts of Free Will. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Deery, O. 2019. Free action as a natural kind. Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-02068-7.
5. Desantis, A., C. Roussel, and F. Waszak. 2011. On the influence of causal beliefs on the feeling of agency. Consciousness and Cognition 20, 1211-1220.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献