Affiliation:
1. University of Belgrade
Abstract
In the analysis of Anaxagoras’ physics in view of the relation between his teachings on multitude and heterogeneity, two central questions emerge: 1) How can the structure of the universe considered purely mereo-topologically help us explain that at the first cosmic stage no qualitative difference is manifest in spite of the fact that the entire qualitative heterogeneity is supposedly already present there? 2) How can heterogeneity become manifest at the second stage, resulting from the noûs intervention, if according to fragment B 6 such a possibility requires the existence of “the smallest”, while according to the general principle stated in fragment B 3 there is not “the smallest” but always only “a smaller”? This paper showcases the perplexity of these two questions but deals only with the former. The answer follows from Anaxagoras’ being a thoroughgoing infinitist in the way in which no Greek physicist was: the principle of space isotropy operative in geometry is extended to physics as well. So any two parts of the original mixture are similar to each other not only in view of the smaller-larger relation but also because each contains everything that the other one contains. This in effect means that at the stage of maximal possible heterogeneity each part of any part contains infinitely many heterogeneous parts of any kind whatsoever. So, neither can there be homogeneous parts in view of any qualitative property, nor can there be predominance in quantity of parts of any kind that would make some property manifest.
Publisher
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences University of Rijeka
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy
Reference79 articles.
1. 1. Arsenijević, M. and M. Adžić. 2014. Gunkology and Pointilism: Two Mutually Supervening Models of the Region-Based and the Point-Based Theory of the Infinite Two-dimensional Continuum. In Space and Time: A Priori and a Posteriori Studies, eds. G. Macchia, F. Orilia, and V. Fano, 137-170. De Gruyter.Review matchReject
2. 2. Arsenijević, M. and M. Kapetanović. 2008. The 'Great Struggle' between Cantorians and Neo-Aristotelians: Much Ado about Nothing. Grazer philosophische Studien 76: 79-90.Review matchReject
3. 3. Barnes, J. 1979. The Presocratic Philosophers. London: Routledge. Burnet, J. 1975. Early Greek Philosophy. 4th edition. A. and C. Black. No match
4. 4. Burnyeat, M. F. 1992. Gregory Vlastos. Phronesis 37: 137-40.Review matchReject
5. 5. Cantor, G. 1895. Beiträge zur Begründung der transfiniten Mengenlehre. Mathematische Annalen 46 (4): 481-512.Review matchReject