Anaxagoras, the thoroughgoing infinitist

Author:

Arsenijević Miloš1ORCID,Popović Saša1ORCID,Vuletić Miloš1

Affiliation:

1. University of Belgrade

Abstract

In the analysis of Anaxagoras’ physics in view of the relation between his teachings on multitude and heterogeneity, two central questions emerge: 1) How can the structure of the universe considered purely mereo-topologically help us explain that at the first cosmic stage no qualitative difference is manifest in spite of the fact that the entire qualitative heterogeneity is supposedly already present there? 2) How can heterogeneity become manifest at the second stage, resulting from the noûs intervention, if according to fragment B 6 such a possibility requires the existence of “the smallest”, while according to the general principle stated in fragment B 3 there is not “the smallest” but always only “a smaller”? This paper showcases the perplexity of these two questions but deals only with the former. The answer follows from Anaxagoras’ being a thoroughgoing infinitist in the way in which no Greek physicist was: the principle of space isotropy operative in geometry is extended to physics as well. So any two parts of the original mixture are similar to each other not only in view of the smaller-larger relation but also because each contains everything that the other one contains. This in effect means that at the stage of maximal possible heterogeneity each part of any part contains infinitely many heterogeneous parts of any kind whatsoever. So, neither can there be homogeneous parts in view of any qualitative property, nor can there be predominance in quantity of parts of any kind that would make some property manifest.

Publisher

Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences University of Rijeka

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy

Reference79 articles.

1. 1. Arsenijević, M. and M. Adžić. 2014. Gunkology and Pointilism: Two Mutually Supervening Models of the Region-Based and the Point-Based Theory of the Infinite Two-dimensional Continuum. In Space and Time: A Priori and a Posteriori Studies, eds. G. Macchia, F. Orilia, and V. Fano, 137-170. De Gruyter.Review matchReject

2. 2. Arsenijević, M. and M. Kapetanović. 2008. The 'Great Struggle' between Cantorians and Neo-Aristotelians: Much Ado about Nothing. Grazer philosophische Studien 76: 79-90.Review matchReject

3. 3. Barnes, J. 1979. The Presocratic Philosophers. London: Routledge. Burnet, J. 1975. Early Greek Philosophy. 4th edition. A. and C. Black. No match

4. 4. Burnyeat, M. F. 1992. Gregory Vlastos. Phronesis 37: 137-40.Review matchReject

5. 5. Cantor, G. 1895. Beiträge zur Begründung der transfiniten Mengenlehre. Mathematische Annalen 46 (4): 481-512.Review matchReject

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3