Abstract
I respond to the 4 commentaries by Awais Aftab & Kristopher Nielsen (A&N), Hane Htut Maung (HHM), Diane O’Leary (DO’L) and Kathryn Tabb (KT) under 3 main headings: “What is the BPSM really?” & Why update it?; “Is our approach foundationally compromised?”, and finally, “Antagonists or fellow travellers?”.
Publisher
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences University of Rijeka
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy
Reference38 articles.
1. Aftab, Awais, and Kristopher Nielsen. 'From Engel to Enactivism: Contextualizing the Biopsychosocial Model'. This issue. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy, 17 (2): (M2)5-23. https://doi.org/10.31820/ejap.17.2.3
2. . 'The Effects of Pain Neuroscience Education and Exercise on Pain, Muscle Endurance, Catastrophizing and Anxiety in Adolescents with Chronic Idiopathic Neck Pain: A School-Based Pilot;Andias;Randomized and Controlled Study Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 34,2018
3. Boden Margaret A. 1999. 'What is Interdisciplinarity?'. In Interdisciplinarity and the Organisation of Knowledge in Europe, edited by R. Cunningham, 13-24. Luxembourg: Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities.
4. Bolton, Derek, and Grant Gillett. 2019. The Biopsychosocial Model of Health and Disease: Philosophical and Scientific Developments. London: Springer Palgrave. Open Access available at https://www.palgrave.com/gp/book/9783030118983
5. Bolton, Derek. 2020. 'The Biopsychosocial Model & the New Medical Humanism'. Archives de Philosophie 83: 13-40. Special Issue edited by J. Ferry-Danini, and E. Giroux. Original English version at https://www.cairn-int.info/article-E_APHI_834_0013-the-biopsychosocial-model-and-the-new.htm
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献