Affiliation:
1. The University of Michigan-Dearborn
Abstract
In this article, I will examine Aristotle’s protreptic argument for the necessity of philosophy as it was deployed by Al-Kindi. I will show how a Muslim critic of philosophy, primarily one who is aligned with the theological outlook of Ibn Hanbal, can reasonably reject the protreptic argument as Al-Kindi presents it. The argument can, however, be reworked in a way to circumvent common criticisms of it presented by Hanbalī-style opponents of philosophy. Indeed, I will argue that, once the argument is properly clarified with reference to what constitutes ‘philosophy’, its soundness is incontrovertible. In closing, I will briefly discuss why Muslim critics of philosophy need not see the protreptic argument as threatening, as the inevitability of philosophy does not necessitate a commitment to all sorts of philosophical positions, however problematic these may be for Islamic doctrine.
Publisher
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences University of Rijeka
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy
Reference25 articles.
1. Aijaz, Imran. 2018. Islam: A Contemporary Philosophical Investigation. London: Routledge.
2. Aristotle. 1950. Physics, (W. D. Ross, Trans.). The Internet Classics Archive, http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/physics.2.ii.html
3. (Original work published 350 B.C.E)
4. ---. Metaphysics, (W. D. Ross, Trans.). The Internet Classics Archive, http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/metaphysics.1.i.html
5. (Original work published 350 B.C.E)