Abstract
It appears at least intuitively appropriate to claim that we owe it to victims to punish those who have wronged them. It also seems plausible to state that we owe it to society to punish those who have violated its norms. However, do we also owe punishment to perpetrators themselves? In other words, do those who commit crimes have a moral right to be punished? This work examines the sustainability of the right to be punished from the standpoint of the two main theories of rights—the will and the interest conceptions. The right to be punished is shown to be largely indefensible on both accounts: on the will theory, the right to be punished conflicts with autonomy, and it can neither be claimed nor waived by a perpetrator; on the interest theory, a perpetrator’s interest in punishment, inasmuch as it exists, is not sufficient to ground a duty on the part of the state.
Publisher
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences University of Rijeka
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy
Reference31 articles.
1. Adler, J. 1992. The Urgings of Conscience: A Theory of Punishment. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
2. Alm, D. 2018. Punishment, consent and value. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 21: 903–914.
3. Bagaric, M., and K. Amarasekara. 2000. The errors of retributivism. Melbourne University Law Review 24: 124-189.
4. Bennett, C. 2008. The apology ritual: A Philosophical Theory of Punishment. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.
5. Brooks, T. 2013. The right to be punished: A defense. Legal Theory in China 3: 21-39.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The Societal Response to Psychopathy in the Community;International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology;2021-06-15