Author:
Olajide Ajayi Olusola,Akinrolabu Olatunde David
Abstract
Electorates expect politicians seeking public office to make known in advance, their intended programs in form of proposal. This is usually presented in speech in form of manifesto. Times within number, manifestos have always precede voting proper whereby the electorates evaluate politicians based on their manifestos. While intention is socially difficult to measure, this study adopts artificial neural network machine learning approach to map-measure the manifestos of politicians and their eventual performance in office. Due to changes in political names and structure, the study could only utilized the manifesto data of the two most popular political parties in Nigeria, from 2007 to 2019. The result of the empirical analysis shows that the model evaluation accuracy stood at 67%. With more adequate data, this result can be improved upon by subsequent research work.
Reference16 articles.
1. Awaah, F. (2021). Experimental Assessment of the Potency of Culturo-Techno-Contextual Approach in Enhancing Performance in Difficult Concepts in the Ghanaian Undergraduate Public Administration Curriculum. Burundi: University of Burundi.
2. Bayram, U., Pestian, J., Santel, D., & Minai, A. A. (2019). What’s in a Word? Detecting Partisan Affiliation from Word Use in Congressional Speeches. 2019 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2019.8851739
3. Bhatia, V. (2018). Examining Consumers’ Attitude Towards Purchase of Counterfeit Fashion Products. Journal of Indian Business Research, 10(2), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIBR-10-2017-0177
4. Bilbao-Jayo, A., & Almeida, A. (2018). Automatic political discourse analysis with multi-scale convolutional neural networks and contextual data. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 14(11), 1550147718811827.
5. Brouard, F., Bujaki, M., Durocher, S., & Neilson, L. C. (2017). Professional Accountants’ Identity Formation: An Integrative Framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 142(2), 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3157-z