Frozen Section Assessment of Bronchial Margins during Lung Carcinoma Surgeries: Report of the Experience at a Single Institution

Author:

Hussein Siba El1,Williams Roy2,Alexis John3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Hematopathology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA

2. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Mount Sinai Medical center, New York, USA

3. Department of Pathology, Mount Sinai Medical center, New York, USA

Abstract

Introduction Many thoracic surgeons consider frozen section analysis of bronchial margins during lobectomies “obligatory” although routine frozen section analysis of the bronchial margin rarely yields positive results and infrequently changes intra-operative management in patients undergoing Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma (NSCLC) resection. Materials and methods 234 cases of lobectomies with carcinoma were reviewed at our institution to assess bronchial margin involvement, correlation between frozen section and final bronchial margin status, gross distance between tumor and margin, and tumor type. Results Tumor distance to margin varied in the 234 cases from grossly involved to 10 cm away. 5 cases out of 234 (approximately 2.1%) had a positive bronchial margin in the final report. 3 out of the 5 cases were poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma grossly abutting the bronchial margin, two cases were of poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma located grossly 0.5 cm away from the bronchial margin. 4 out of 5 cases were called positive intra-operatively. In none of the 4 out of the 5 positive cases did frozen section exam of the bronchial margins change the intra-operative management of the case. Conclusion Our study supports selective use of intra-operative frozen section of bronchial margins during lobectomies for carcinoma. On the basis of our findings, a distance of approximately 1 cm or less is suggested as a threshold for intra-operative microscopic examination of the bronchial margins. However, routine examination of the bronchial margins, regardless of the location of the tumor upon gross examination, and in the absence of empirical evidence supporting this practice, is only time consuming intra-operatively, wasteful of resources and has no therapeutic or prognostic value.

Publisher

Edelweiss Publications Inc

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3