CROSS-FACTOR MODELING OF ESG RISKS

Author:

Kurbanova K. A.1,Nurmagambetova A. Z.1,Nurgaliyeva A. M.2

Affiliation:

1. Al-Farabi Kazakh National University

2. Narxoz University

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop a cross-factor model for assessing ESG risks in the Republic of Kazakhstan.The research methodology involves using cross-factor modeling with standard multivariate statistical methods, including multiple regression analysis, to assess ESG risks in Kazakhstan from 2010 to 2020. The methodology incorporates environmental, economic, and social components into a model, calculating their respective sums and determining the integral ESG indicator (I) through normalization and weighted averaging. The final stage involves conducting regression analysis to determine the coefficients for each component, ensuring that the model accurately reflects the impact of these factors on the region's economic security.The orginality / value of the research: This model aims to evaluate the mutual and combined effects of various ESG factors on integral indicators, with the goal of understanding how these factors can lead to reputational or financial damage to companies. By defining and measuring three structural components— environmental, economic, and social—the study constructs a set of indicators for each component and employs multiple regression analysis to build a comprehensive model and determine the coefficients for an integral ESG indicator.Findings. To assess ESG risks in Kazakhstan, cross-factor analysis methods are recommended, enabling the determination and justification of each factor's numerical contribution to the integral indicator. Recent dynamics in implementing ESG principles in Kazakhstan's corporate practice are uneven, influenced by factors such as company publicity and sector-specific ESG risks. Regulatory changes, including updates to the Environmental and Entrepreneurial Codes and ESG reporting requirements, create incentives for corporations to adopt ESG principles, necessitating further regulatory improvements and increased business community awareness.

Publisher

Narxoz University - Non-profit joint stock company

Reference19 articles.

1. Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). The consequences of mandatory corporate sustainability reporting. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(1), 1-30.

2. Pedersen, L. H., Fitzgibbons, S., & Pomorski, L. (2019). Investors have little guidance on how to meaningfully integrate ESG. NYU Stern School of Business, 1-24.

3. Bassen, A., & Kovacs, A. M. M. (2008). ESG reporting and investment: How to measure and compare ESG data. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsund Unternehmensethik, 9(1), 11-21.

4. Bauer, R., & Hann, D. (2010). Corporate environmental management and credit risk. SSRN. Retrieved May 17, 2024, from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1660470.

5. Setyahuni, S. W., & Handayani, R. S. (2020). On the value relevance of information on environmental, social, and governance (ESG): An evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(12), 50-58.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3