Affiliation:
1. Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
2. Narxoz University
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to conduct a comparative assessment of the country risk of the banking sector of the countries of the world using the methods BICRA from S&P and Bloomberg.Methodology. As the main research methods were used: generalization, BICRA from S&P and Bloomberg methods, comparative analysis.Originality/value of the research. The article provides a comparative analysis of the results of the assessment of country risks of the banking sector of the countries of the world according to the BICRA from S&P and Bloomberg methods based on current data for the last 3 years.Findings. The results of the analysis showed that despite the diff erence between the BICRA from S&P and Bloomberg methods, the results are generally almost identical. There are exceptions in some countries.According to the authors, this is due to the presence of accounting for currency risks in the Bloomberg methodology.
Publisher
Narxoz University - Non-profit joint stock company
Reference26 articles.
1. Giovannini, A., Iacopetta, M. and Minetti, R. (2013). Financial markets, banks, and growth: Disentangling the Links. Documents de Travail de l’OFCE, 131, 105–47.
2. Athari, S. A. (2021). Domestic Political Risk, Global Economic Policy Uncertainly, and Banks’Profi tability: Evidence from Ukrainian Banks. Post-Communist Economies, 33, 458-483.
3. Bucci, A., and Marsiglio, S. (2019). Financial Development and Economic Growth: Long-run Equilibrium and Transitional Dynamics. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 66, 331–59.
4. Nguyen, Phuc Tran, and Trinh Thi Tuyet Pham (2021). The Impact of Financial Development onEconomic Growth: Empirical Evidence from Transitional Economies. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8, 191-201.
5. Ruziyeva, E. A., Nurgaliyeva, A. M., Duisenbayeva, B. B., Assanova, A. B., and Shtiller, M. V. (2019). Analysis of investments role in the economic development. Bulletin of National Academy of sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 2(378), 189-198.