Assessing Techniques for Quantifying the Impact of Bias Due to an Unmeasured Confounder: An Applied Example-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Assessing Techniques for Quantifying the Impact of Bias Due to an Unmeasured Confounder: An Applied Example

Published:2021-07 Issue: Volume:Volume 13 Page:627-635
ISSN:1179-1349
Container-title:Clinical Epidemiology
language:en
Short-container-title:CLEP

Author:

Barberio Julie^ORCID,Ahern Thomas P,MacLehose Richard F,Collin Lindsay J,Cronin-Fenton Deirdre P^ORCID,Damkier Per^ORCID,Sørensen Henrik Toft^ORCID,Lash Timothy L^ORCID

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Epidemiology

Reference23 articles.

1. On the definition of a confounder

2. Basic Methods for Sensitivity Analysis of Biases

3. Sensitivity Analysis Without Assumptions

4. Indirect Assessment of Confounding: Graphic Description and Limits on Effect of Adjusting for Covariates

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Evaluation of quantitative bias analysis in epidemiological research: A systematic review from 2010 to mid‐2023;Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice;2024-06-21

2. Can Weight of Evidence, Quantitative Bias, and Bounding Methods Evaluate Robustness of Real-world Evidence for Regulator and Health Technology Assessment Decisions on Medical Interventions?;Clinical Therapeutics;2023-12

3. Cardiovascular Safety in Postmenopausal Women and Men With Osteoporosis Treated With Denosumab and Zoledronic Acid: A Post‐Authorization Safety Study;JBMR Plus;2023-08-21

4. Quantitative bias analysis in practice: review of software for regression with unmeasured confounding;BMC Medical Research Methodology;2023-05-04

5. Pragmatic considerations for negative control outcome studies to guide non‐randomized comparative analyses: A narrative review;Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety;2023-04-04