Factors associated with the intermediate probability of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction on the H₂FPEF score in asymptomatic patients in rotation work conditions in the Arctic

Abstract

Aim. To study the factors associated with the intermediate probability of heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) according to the H2FPEF score (Heavy; Hypertensive; Atrial Fibrillation; Pulmonary Hypertension; Elder; Filling Pressure) in asymptomatic patients in rotation work conditions in the Arctic.Material and methods. In the polar village of Yamburg (68° 21’ 40” northern latitude), 100 men and 80 women with grade 1, 2 hypertension and normotensive persons were examined on the basis of the Medical Unit of OOO Gazprom Dobycha Yamburg. All patients underwent echocardiography using generally accepted methods of imaging and data processing, according to European Society of Echocardiography guidelines. To calculate the probability of HFpEF, the H2FPEF score was used. The Bruce protocol treadmill test was performed. The SF-36 (Health Status Survey) questionnaire for assessment of life quality was used.Results. Group 1 included 95 male and female patients with a low probability of HF (H2FPEF score — 0-1), group 2 — 85 patients of both sexes with an intermediate probability of HF (H2FPEF score — 2-5). Group 2 patients were older (p=0,038), worked longer on a shift (p=0,0143), and had higher ambulatory systolic (p=0,0001) and diastolic blood pressure (p=0,0013) with a higher body mass index (BMI) (p=0,0001). Based on the odds ratio (OR) analysis, the factor most strongly influencing the intermediate probability of HFpEF was BMI (OR=1,261, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1,140-1,393). SF-36 questionnaire revealed intergroup differences only on the role functioning scale (p=0,013) with lower values in group 2. In the logistic regression model, dyspnea during the treadmill test occupied a leading position as follows: OR=8,952; 95% CI: 3,454-15,197 (p<0,0001). The second place was taken by inotropic reserve value (OR=1,020; 95% CI: 1,006-1,035 (p=0,005), which was higher in group 2 and was regarded as one of the compensatory mechanisms for adapting to stress. In the group 2, echocardiography revealed significant differences in terms of left ventricular (LV) myocardial mass (p=0,0002), LV internal area (p=0,0002), isovolumic relaxation time (p=0,003), and ratio of transmitral diastolic flow rate to mean mitral annulus velocity (p=0,0001), which indirectly indicates the presence of LV diastolic dysfunction.Conclusion. There are following factors associated with H2FPEF intermediate probability of HFpEF in asymptomatic patients on shift in the Arctic: BMI, length of shift, dyspnea and an increase in inotropic reserve during exercise due to a decrease in adaptive potential, impaired LV diastolic function. Initiating management strategies that target identified factors in patients with asymptomatic HF may slow symptomatic disease progression in shift workers in the Arctic region.