Analysis of questionnaires from the perspective of hospitalization risk prediction. Systematic review

Author:

Shepel R. N.1ORCID,Demko V. V.2ORCID,Goncharov M. V.2ORCID,Lukyanov M. M.2ORCID,Martsevich S. Yu.2ORCID,Berns S. A.2ORCID,Drapkina O. M.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine; Russian University of Medicine

2. National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine

Abstract

One of the key tasks facing the medical community and health professionals is the identification of patients at high risk of hospitalization, including emergency one. Currently, various approaches are used to obtain information about certain predictors in a patient that are as­sociated with an increased hospitalization risk, but there is no consensus on which of them are most effective.Aim. To summarize data from studies that has analyzed the prognostic value of various predictors used in questionnaires or patient surveys associated with an increased hospitalization risk.Material and methods. We search for full-text articles in 8 Russian and foreign electronic databases (Scopus, PubMed, BMC Health Services Research, BMJ Research, Google Scholar, e-library, Oxford Academic, Wiley Online Library), published in the period from January 1, 1993 to January 1, 2023 and containing information about questionnaires on hospitalization risk prediction. The study was carried out in 4 following stages: 1 — search for articles using keywords in electronic databases; 2 — duplicate elimination; 3 — search for full-text versions of articles and their assessment for compliance with inclusion/ exclusion criteria; 4 — data analysis, systematization of hospitalization predictors used in questionnaires.Results. In total, out of 28133 initial publications, 13 full-text papers describing studies that fully met the inclusion/exclusion criteria were admitted to stage 4 and were included in the final analysis. These studies were devoted to the description of 11 questionnaires, their modification or testing. The majority of the articles found (53,8%) were conducted in the United States. When analyzing questionnaires to assess the hospitalization risk, among 61 identified predictors, the following were most often used In questionnaires: "age ≥75 years"; "≥1 hospitalization within one to two years preceding filling out the questionnaire"; "taking ≥5 prescription medications"; "male sex"; "history of diabetes", and "satisfactory/unsatisfactory self-perceived health status". A more detailed analysis of questionnaires to assess the risk of one-year hospitalization among people ≥65 years old found that the following predictors were most often used: "age ≥75 years", "≥1 hospitalization in the period from one to two years before filling out the questionnaire", and "taking ≥3 prescription medications".Conclusion. Evidence is summarized on predictors used in questionnaires on hospitalization risk assessment. Additional research is needed to validate established predictors in the Russian population, their cause-and-effect relationship, and to search for novel predictors influencing the hospitalization risk among the working age and post-working age population.

Publisher

Silicea - Poligraf, LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3