Which scale is best to assess the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with stable coronary artery disease in the Russian population?

Author:

Shakhmatova O. O.1ORCID,Komarov A. L.1ORCID,Ergasheva U. P.1ORCID,Korobkova V. V.1ORCID,Minushkina L. O.2ORCID,Brazhnik V. A.3ORCID,Zateyshchikov D. A.3ORCID,Yarovaya E. B.4ORCID,Panchenko E. P.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Chazov National Medical Research Center of Cardiology

2. Central State Medical Academy

3. Central State Medical Academy; N.E. Bauman City Clinical Hospital № 29

4. Chazov National Medical Research Center of Cardiology; Lomonosov Moscow State University

Abstract

Aim. To evaluate and compare the prognostic value of various scales on the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) in the Russian population.Material and methods. The study included patients with stable CAD — participants of the REGATTA-1 prospective single-center registry. The number of points was assessed according to the reference score of the 2015 European Society of Cardiology (ESC), PRECISE-DAPT, ABC-HBR and REACH scores, as well as two Russian scores — the REGATTA score and the ORACUL score, originally developed for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).Results. A total of 623 patients were included (median age 60 [53, 68] years; men — 78,7%). Over 2,5 [1,1-14,7]-year follow-up, the incidence of major and clinically significant GIBs was 1,9 cases/100 people/year. There were following score with sufficient predictive value: REGATTA — Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (ROC AUC) 0,865, p<0,0001, F1 measure 0,4; ESC 2015 — ROC AUC 0,791, p<0,0001, F1 measure 0,243; PRECISE-DAPT — ROC AUC 0,713, p=0,001, F1 measure 0,397, and ABC HBR — ROC AUC 0,743, p<0,01, F1 measure 0,432. The REGATTA score is characterized by the greatest predictive significance (p<0,05 for all pairwise comparisons). The original ORACUL scale (ROC AUC 0,507, p=0,9, F1 measure 0,150) and the REACH scale (ROC AUC 0,572, p=0,164, F1 0,177) did not significantly predict the GIB risk. The identified patterns maintained when analyzed with binary values "high risk/no high risk" for each of the scales. Modified ORACUL scale for stable coronary artery disease after recalibration using binary analysis was not inferior to the ESC 2015, PRECISE-DAPT and ABC-HBR scales (ROC AUC — 0,645 (p=0,002)).Conclusion. The universal PRECISE-DAPT and ABC-HBR scales can be used to assess the GIB risk of along with the 2015 ESC score in patients with stable coronary artery disease. The Russian REGATTA score has the best predictive ability, but its limitation is the lack of external validation. Modification and recalibration of the ORACUL scale significantly increases its predictive value in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

Publisher

Silicea - Poligraf, LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3