Cardiovascular risk stratification in stable coronary artery disease based on prognostic scores and models-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Cardiovascular risk stratification in stable coronary artery disease based on prognostic scores and models

Published:2020-07-03 Issue:3 Volume:19 Page:2528
ISSN:2619-0125
Container-title:Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention
language:
Short-container-title:Cardiovasc Ther Prev

Author:

Tolpygina S. N.¹^ORCID,Martsevich S Yu.¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine

Abstract

According to modern clinical guidelines, the strategy of examination and treatment of a patient with stable coronary artery disease depends on the prognosis. Despite the great number of prognostic models and scores, there is currently no unified approach for cardiovascular risk stratification. The article provides a literature review of the main current prognostic models and scores, taking into account their effectiveness and limitations.

Publisher

Silicea - Poligraf, LLC

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference28 articles.

1. Тask Force Members, Montalescot G, Sechtem U, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(38):2949-3003. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht296.

2. Mark DB, Nelson CL, Califf RM, et al. Continuing evolution of therapy for coronary artery disease: initial results from the era of coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 1994;89:2015-25. doi:10.1161/01.cir.89.5.2015.

3. Emond M, Mock MB, Davis KB, et al. Long-term survival of medically treated patients in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) Registry. Circulation. 1994;(90)6:2645-57. doi:10.1161/01.cir.90.6.2645.

4. Califf RM, Phillips HR, Hindman MC, et al. Prognostic value of a coronary artery jeopardy score. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985;5:1055- 63. doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(85)80005-x.

5. Califf RM, Armstrong PW, Carver JR, et al. 27th Bethesda Conference: matching the intensity of risk factor management with the hazard for coronary disease events. Task Force 5. Stratification of patients into high, medium and low risk subgroups for purposes of risk factor management. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;5(27):1007-19. doi:10.1016/0735-1097(96)87733-3.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. CarotidSCORE.RU — risk stratification for complications after carotid endarterectomy;Russian Journal of Cardiology;2022-05-04

2. Comparative assessment of short-term prognosis in patients with ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome without percutaneous coronary intervention based on the GRACE, TIMI, RECORD, PREDICT scales;Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention;2022-01-28

3. Enhanced risk stratification scale for predicting death and non-fatal cardiovascular events in patients of the PROGNOZ IBS registry;Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention;2021-11-28