Abstract
Although mixed-use campuses are recognized by designers, little attention is paid to the social values that their outdoor environment generates for the wider community. Aiming to identify social values, the methodology used in this study includes a survey that is applied via an online questionnaire (N=156) to explore users’ perceptions about the values the campus produces to translate into indicators of wellbeing. This study’s aim is to identify indicators of wellbeing that can capture campus social value, referring to a continuously changing campus (Agricultural University of Tirana). The results indicate that the social and cultural benefits that come from a mixed-use campus are related to the adequacy of physical outdoor environments and social activities. However, compared to mixed-use spaces, outdoor spaces that preserve the functions of agricultural backgrounds (as originally designed) have higher social values. We suggest that both physical and non-physical determinants play a basic role in enhancing social interaction (this is a strong indicator), so they must be included in the policies and strategies of the higher education systems.
Publisher
Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture & Planning
Reference45 articles.
1. Abu-Ghazzeh, T. M. (1999, 11). Communicating Behavioral Research to Campus Design Factors Affecting the Perception and Use of Outdoor Spaces at the University of Jordan. Environment and Behavior, 31(6), 764-804.
2. Akhir, N. M., Sakip, S. R., Abbas, M. Y., & Othman, N. (2018, 08 26). Landscape Spatial Character: Students’ preferences on outdoor campus spaces, Asian Journal of Quality of Life, 3(13), 89-97.
3. Alba-Patino, D., Carabassa, V., Castro, H., Gutiérrez-Briceño, I., García-Llorente, M., Giagnocavo, C., & Castro, A. J. (2021). Social indicators of ecosystem restoration for enhancing human wellbeing. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 174, 105782.
4. Ali, A., & Faruquie, D. S. (2015). Effectiveness of Social and Cultural Sustainability Practices in Built Environment: A Quasi-Systematic Review. Academia.
5. AUT. (2001). Agricultural University of Tirana. Bari, Italy: Tecnomack.