Abstract
Efforts to increase the quality of this environment have been going on since the beginning of the concern for shelter in the history of humanity. The main targets of the user, designers, practitioners, and decision-makers are to carry the quality of life, health, safety, and welfare of individuals and other living things to the next level. Problems have been identified to increase the function and quality of the space, spatial requirements have been determined, and researched, and some design factors have been determined to reach the most appropriate solution. The researchers focused on the proposition that the effectiveness of these factors before and during the design process would increase the quality of the space. However, since research generally focuses on indoor quality, the outdoor quality factors that are part of urban design are not clear. This work, was designed to evaluate the usability of these factors, which were determined and measured especially to deal with the interior, in designs at larger scales (street, neighborhood, city…) and to improve the existing. In designs outside the spatial scale, where almost all factors can be controlled by the relevant stakeholders of the process, the subject is approached through changeable and unchangeable parameters and their balancing. Studies on the factors determined during the process were compiled and their effects on different scales were evaluated as a result of these compilations. As a result of the evaluation, some suggestions were given. In the process of redesigning the space, selecting feasible suggestions, and incorporating them into the creation of the future physical space, using the suggestions as urban rehabilitation tools, and considering these interventions to be flexible and suitable for various factors are of great importance for the psychology of the users.
Publisher
Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture & Planning
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference258 articles.
1. Aburawis, A. (2019). Evaluating the relationship between indoor soundscape perception and overall spatial experience through acoustical post-occupancy evaluation (Ph.D. Thesis). Çankaya University, Ankara.
2. Acosta, I. & Figueiro, M., (2015). Analysis of Circadian Stimulus Allowed by Daylighting in Hospital Rooms, Lighting Research and Technology, 49, 49–61.
3. Acun, V., & Yilmazer, S. (2018). Understanding the indoor soundscape of study areas in terms of users’ satisfaction, coping methods and perceptual dimensions. Noise Control Engineering Journal, 66(1), 66–75.
4. Adang, D., Campo, B., & Vander Vorst, A. (2006, September). Has a 970 MHz pulsed exposure an effect on the memory related behaviour of rats? In 2006 European Conference on Wireless Technology (pp. 135-138). IEEE.
5. Ahadi A. A., Hanmohammadi M. K., Masoudinejad M., & Alirezaie B., (2016). Improving student performance by proper utilization of daylight in educational environments (Case study: IUST1 School of Architecture), Acta Technica Napocensis: Civil Engineering Architecture, 59 (1), 1- 21.