Autonomy and care in the logic of competing and solidarity relations in medicine

Author:

Sidorova Tatyana A.,

Abstract

The interactions of the subjects of medicine are considered in the projection of two logics: solidary and competing relations. This approach develops the critique of the dominance of the concept of patient autonomy that comes with the bioethics represented in the ethics of care by K. Dörner, A. Moll and others. The conceptual forms of competition and solidarity are identified as oppositions to power and equality, autonomy and care, individualism and interdependence of subjects of medicine, anti-paternalism and paternalism, neglect and attentiveness, the legal and ethical meaning of informed consent, control and compliance, medical services and medical care. In medicine, from point of view of bioethics, the solidary relations could be expressed in a paternalistic model. It is based on ethi-cal connotations such as doctor's responsibility and mutual trust. Autonomy has a legal and economic predication. The ethics of care, traditional for the Russian cultural model, implies not so much the doctor's authorities over the patient, recognizing him as unequal in medical decisions, but in modern healthcare it can be combined with a voluntary expression of consent to medical interventions with the properly provided information.

Publisher

Volgograd State Medical University

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference10 articles.

1. Veatch R.M. Hippocratic, religious, and secular ethics: The points of conflict. Theoretical Medicine and Bioeth-ics Philosophy of Medical Research and Practice. 2012;33(1).

2. Siluyanova I. V. Selected. About calling a doctor. Mos-cow: Publishing house of Forma LLC, 2008. 256 p. (in Rus.).

3. Starobinets A.A. Look at him. Moscow, AST Publ., 2017. 115 p. (in Rus.).

4. Vitch R. Models of moral medicine in the era of revolu-tionary changes. Voprosy filosofii = Questions of Philos-ophy. 1994;3:67–72. (in Rus.).

5. Ivanyushkin A.Ya. Bioethics and psychiatry. Voprosy filosofii = Questions of Philosophy. 1994;3:77–90. (in Rus.).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3