Comparison of hyperbaric oxygen therapy pressures for acute carbon monoxide poisoning

Author:

Kim Jeong YunORCID,Lim JihyeORCID,Kim Sung HwaORCID,Han Sang IlORCID,Cha Yong SungORCID

Abstract

Purpose: No consensus currently exists regarding the maximal pressure of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO<sub>2</sub>) therapy performed within 24 hours of acute carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning. This study aimed to evaluate the difference in therapeutic effects according to the first HBO<sub>2</sub> pressure (3.0 atmospheres absolute [ATA] vs. 2.8 ATA).Methods: We used prospectively collected registry data on CO poisoning at a tertiary academic hospital in the Republic of Korea. Adult patients with acute CO poisoning treated with HBO<sub>2</sub> within 24 hours after arrival at the emergency department and without the use of additional HBO<sub>2</sub> after 24 hours between January 2007 and February 2022 were included. Data from 595 patients were analyzed using propensity score matching (PSM). Patients with mild (non-intubated) and severe (intubated) poisoning were also compared. Neurocognitive outcomes at 1 month after CO poisoning were evaluated using the Global Deterioration Scale combined with neurological impairment.Results: After PSM, the neurocognitive outcomes at 1-month post-CO exposure were not significantly different between the 2.8 ATA (110 patients) and 3.0 ATA (55 patients) groups (<i>p</i>=1.000). Similarly, there was also no significant difference in outcomes in a subgroup analysis according to poisoning severity in matched patients (165 patients) (mild [non-intubated]: <i>p</i>=0.053; severe [intubated]: <i>p</i>=1.000).Conclusion: Neurocognitive sequelae at 1 month were not significantly different between HBO<sub>2</sub> therapy pressures of 2.8 ATA and 3.0 ATA in patients with acute CO poisoning. In addition, the 1-month neurocognitive sequelae did not differ significantly between intubated and non-intubated patients.

Funder

Korea Medical Device Development Fund

Ministry of Science and ICT

Publisher

Korean Society of Clinical Toxicology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3