Author:
De Santana Maria Gabriela Brito,Lima Luis Henrique Guedes de Andrade,Batista Lorena Vitória Alves da Fonseca,Cardoso Analice Malveira,Medeiros Júnior Martinho Dinoá
Abstract
This study aims to provide the main features, indications, and contraindications of synthetic exogenous materials used to reconstruct defects in the orbital cavity. In addition, present the available clinical data on these biomaterials. This integrative literature review was carried out in the PubMed, Periódicos CAPES, and Virtual Health Library (VHL) databases in May and June 2022. At first, the search followed the following strategy on the PubMed and CAPES Periodicals platforms - (reconstructive surgical procedures AND orbit AND biomaterials). Then, in the VHL platform, with the combination - (orbit AND biomaterials). There were restrictions for articles published in the last five years. Titanium was the most frequently found material in this search, with 38% of the total number of articles. The material was also associated with Porous Polyethylene, Polyetheretherketone, and in the form of Titanium-Nickel alloy. The following materials were also included: Hydroxyapatite; Non-sintered hydroxyapatite particles and a composite sheet of Poly L'Lactide with adhesion fixation; Porous Polyethylene; Polytetrafluoroethylene; Polyetheretheretherketone; Polydioxanone; Polymethylmethacrylate; and Polycaprolactone. Orbital reconstruction surgeries can be challenging because of the anatomical complexity of the region and the impact that repairing this structure has on the individual. The most common alloplastic materials used for orbit reconstruction are titanium mesh and porous polyethylene. The type of injury, the particularities of each patient, the operator's training, the material's availability, and the technological apparatus should be considered in the clinical decision of which to use. Good results in orbital reconstruction surgeries require more and more innovations in technologies, materials, and professional training.
Publisher
South Florida Publishing LLC
Reference28 articles.
1. SOUZA, B. Utilização de tela de titânio na reconstrução orbitária em fratura tipo blow out impura: relato de caso. Revista de Cirurgia e Traumatologia Buco-Maxilo-Facial [online], v. 18, n. 1, p. 19-23, 2018. Available from: http://www.revistacirurgiabmf.com/2018/01/Artigos/04relatodeccaso.pdf. Accessed on: June 24, 2022.
2. YANG, J. R.; LIAO, H. T. Functional and aesthetic outcome of extensive orbital floor and medial wall fracture via navigation and endoscope-assisted reconstruction. Annals of Plastic Surgery [online], Jan. 2019, v. 82, p. S77-S85. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001700.
3. LANDRY, M. et al. Delayed infection of porous polyethylene implants after oncologic maxillectomy and reconstruction: 2 case reports and review of literature. Ear, Nose & Throat Journal [online], June 15, 2020. doi 10.1177/0145561320927525.
4. GROB, S.; TAO, J.; YONKERS, M. Orbital Fracture Repair. Seminars in Plastic Surgery [online], Feb. 28, 2017, v. 31, n. 01, p. 31-39. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1598191.
5. HOMER, N.; HUGGINS, A.; DURAIRAJ, V. D. Contemporary management of orbital blowout fractures. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery [online], Aug. 2019, v. 27, n. 4, p. 310-316. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/moo.0000000000000550. Accessed on: June 24, 2022.