Author:
Kato Renata Mayumi,Bianchi Jonas,Parizotto Julianna,Wolford Larry Miller,Peixoto Adriano Porto,Gonçalves João Roberto
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the role of high condylectomy on surgical treatment stability of Class III patients with condylar hyperplasia. Materials and Methods: Twenty-four patients (9 females and 15 males) were paired according to gender, age, skeletal and dental characteristics in three groups. Group 1 (no condylar hyperplasia) underwent orthognathic surgery only, Group 2 (with unilateral or bilateral condylar hyperplasia) underwent high condylectomy, articular disc repositioning and orthognathic surgery in the same procedure and Group 3 (with unilateral or bilateral condylar hyperplasia) underwent orthognathic surgery only. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were selected at the immediately before surgery (T1), immediate after surgery (T2) and longest follow-up (T3). Results: Cephalometric comparison between the 3 groups showed no significant differences among the variables at the initial observation period (T1). During the observational period (T3-T2), patients in Group 3 showed significant relapse at SNB (mean = 2.18, sd = 1.39 degrees), ANB (mean = -2.68, sd = 2.24 degrees), SN.Pog (mean = -1.48, sd = 1.66 degrees), OJ (mean = -2.99, sd = 1.64 mm), OB (mean = 1.45, sd = 1.16 mm), Ar-Go (mean = 2.23, sd = 2.66 mm), Ar-Gn (mean = 3.76, sd = 1.48 mm), S-Gn (mean = 2.3, sd = 2.34 mm) and ANS-Me (mean = 2.06, sd = 2.2 mm) demonstrating that treatment adopted was insufficient for stable results within this Group. Groups 1 and 2 remained stable one year after surgery. Conclusions: Orthognathic surgery for correction of skeletal class III malocclusion is a stable procedure for patients without condylar growth abnormalities and for patients undergoing simultaneous high condylectomies and articular disc repositioning. Those patients with preoperative condylar hyperplasia who underwent double-jaw surgery and no TMJ intervention experienced significant relapse.
Publisher
South Florida Publishing LLC
Reference33 articles.
1. Busby BR, Bailey LJ, Proffit WR, Phillips C, White RP, Jr.: Long-term stability of surgical class III treatment: a study of 5-year postsurgical results. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 17:159, 2002
2. Mucedero M, Coviello A, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Cozza P: Stability factors after double-jaw surgery in Class III malocclusion. A systematic review. Angle Orthod 78:1141, 2008
3. Jakobsone G, Stenvik A, Sandvik L, Espeland L: Three-year follow-up of bimaxillary surgery to correct skeletal Class III malocclusion: stability and risk factors for relapse. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 139:80, 2011
4. Al-Delayme R, Al-Khen M, Hamdoon Z, Jerjes W: Skeletal and dental relapses after skeletal class III deformity correction surgery: single-jaw versus double-jaw procedures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol [Epud ahed of print], 2012
5. Proffit WR, Phillips C, Turvey TA: Stability after mandibular setback: mandible-only versus 2-jaw surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70:e408, 2012