Affiliation:
1. RA Republican Veterinary-Sanitary and Phytosanitary Laboratory Services Center, SNCO
2. Food safety risk analysis and assessment research center
Abstract
The study aimed to assess 58 veterinary laboratory specialists' knowledge, attitudes, and practices concerning brucellosis across all regional (Marz) and central laboratories (Reference Laboratory for Especially Dangerous Pathogens). The survey was developed to assess the knowledge of lab specialists and identify gaps in laboratory activities that may have an impact on test results. Questions covered the following topics: a) disease epidemiology, b) sample conditions, c) biosafety and biosecurity, and d) laboratory tests, requirements, and indicators. According to the results, 45 % of respondents are 51 years old or older, most (26 respondents/45 %) have six to ten years of laboratory experience, and 20 respondents (35 %) have 21 years and more experience. Eleven people (19 %) had not received professional training. At the same time, 90 % and more correct answers were given by respondents who had passed training during the last year. In the last year, a person took training but did not answer 90% of the questions correctly. Most part (86 %) of respondents were not familiar with lab test indicators (sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, etc.) and 46 (79 %) were unaware of screening and confirmation tests requirements. Only 55 % (32 people) knew that one serological test was insufficient to make a final diagnosis, but 24 (75 %) of those respondents could not justify that. This study shows that it is necessary to review the current mechanisms for the preparation of laboratory specialists. This will indirectly impact an accurate assessment of the epidemiological situation of brucellosis in Armenia.
Publisher
Armenian National Agrarian University
Reference11 articles.
1. Chen, S., Zhang, H., Liu, X., Wang, W., Hou, S., Li T., Zhao, S., Yang, Z., Li, C. (2014). Increasing threat of brucellosis to low-risk persons in urban settings, China. Emerg Infect Dis. - pp. 126-30. https://doi. org/10.3201%2Feid2001.130324.
2. Corbel, M.J. Banai, M. (2005). Family III. Brucellaceae, Genus I. Brucella, in Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology, D.R. Boone, R.W. Castenholz, and G.M. Garrity, Editors. 2005, Springer: New York. - pp. 370-386.
3. Dadar, M., Tiwari, R., Sharun, K., Dhama, K. (2021). Importance of brucellosis control programs of livestock on the improvement of one health. Vet Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1080/01652176.2021.1894501.
4. Dhanashekar, R., Akkinepalli, S., Nellutla, A. (2012). Milk-borne infections. An analysis of their potential effect on the milk industry. Germs, - pp. 101-109. https://doi.org/10.11599%2Fgerms.2012.1020.
5. Galinska, E.M., Zagorski, J. (2013). Brucellosis in humansetiology, diagnostics, clinical forms. Annals of Agricultural Environmental Medicine, Vol. 20. - pp. 233-238.