Validation of basal metabolic rate equations in persons with innervated and denervated chronic spinal cord injury

Author:

Alazzam Ahmad M.1,Gorgey Ashraf S.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Spinal Cord Injury and Disorders Center, Richmond VA Medical Center Richmond Virginia USA

2. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond Virginia USA

Abstract

AbstractBasal metabolic rate (BMR) measurement is time consuming and requires specialized equipment. Prediction equations allow clinicians and researchers to estimate BMR; however, their accuracy may vary across individuals with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). The objective of this study was to investigate the validity of SCI‐specific equations as well as able‐bodied (AB) prediction equations in individuals with upper motor neuron (UMN), lower motor neuron (LMN), and females with SCI. Twenty‐six men and women with chronic SCI (n = 12 innervated males, n = 6 innervated females, n = 8 denervated males) participated in this cross‐sectional study. BMR values were measured by indirect calorimetry. Body composition (dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry and anthropometrics) assessment was conducted. AB‐prediction equations [Cunningham, Nelson, Owen, Harris and Benedict, Mifflin, Schofield, Henry] and SCI‐specific equations [Chun and Nightingale & Gorgey] were used to estimate and validate BMR. The accuracy of AB‐specific FFM equations in predicting BMR was evaluated using Bland–Altman plots, paired t‐tests, and error metrics. Measured BMR for innervated males, females, and denervated males was 1436 ± 213 kcal/day, 1290 ± 114, and 1597 ± 333 kcal/day, respectively. SCI‐specific equations by Chun et al., Nightingale & Gorgey, and AB‐specific FFM equations accurately predicted BMR for innervated males. For the denervated males, Model 4 equation by Nightingale & Gorgey was not different (p = 0.18), and Bland–Altman analyses showed negative mean bias but similar limits of agreement between measured and predicted BMR for the SCI‐specific equations and AB‐specific FFM equations. We demonstrated that SCI‐specific equations accurately predicted BMR for innervated males but underpredicted it for denervated males. The Model 4 equation by Nightingale & Gorgey accurately estimated BMR in females with SCI. Findings from the current study will help to determine caloric needs in different sub‐groups of SCI.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3