Affiliation:
1. Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila Bucharest Romania
2. Department of Cardiology University and Emergency Hospital Bucharest Romania
3. Department of Radiology University and Emergency Hospital Bucharest Romania
4. Department of Medical Biology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam the Netherlands
Abstract
AbstractNumerous diagnostic criteria for excessive trabeculation, or “noncompaction,” score the extent of the trabecular layer. Whether the trabeculations themselves have a poor or good contractility is largely unknown. We retrospectively analyzed cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) of patients with excessive trabeculation of the left ventricle (LV). The LV was labeled into four regions: compact wall, central cavity (CC), trabeculations, and intertrabecular recesses (IR). For each label we calculated the systolic fractional volume change (SFVC) in short‐axis images (n = 15) and systolic fractional area change (SFAC) in four‐chamber images (n = 30). We measured the ejection fraction (EF) of IR, CC, and total cavity. Three methods to calculate EF of the total cavity were compared: trabeculations included (per guidelines), IR excluded (Jacquier criterion), and trabeculations contoured and excluded (contour‐EF). The SFVC and SFAC of the compact wall were similar with SFVC and SFAC of trabeculations. In contrast, the IR were more diminished in systole by comparison with the CC, having lower SFVC (39% vs. 56%) and SFAC (37% vs. 72%). EF of the IR was also greater than EF of the CC (61% vs. 44%). Excluding IR from the total cavity or including trabeculations negatively impacts the EF (44% and 40%, respectively, vs. 51% for contour‐EF). The trabecular layer operates at a high EF.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献