Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Kinesiology University of Calgary Calgary Canada
2. Applied Physiology and Nutrition Research Group ‐ Center of Lifestyle Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP Universidade de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil
3. College of Health and Life Sciences Hamad Bin Khalifa University Doha Qatar
4. College of Medicine University of Central Florida Orlando Florida USA
Abstract
AbstractAn index of heart rate variability (HRV), detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA a1) has gathered interest as a surrogate marker of exercise intensity boundaries. The aim of this report was to examine heart rate variability threshold (HRVT) behavior across different ramp incremental (RI) slopes. Seventeen participants completed a series of three RI (15, 30, and 45 W · min−1 slopes) with monitoring of gas exchange parameters, heart rate (HR) and HRV. HRVT1 was defined as the V̇O2 or HR at which DFA a1 reached 0.75 and the HRVT2 at which these values reached 0.5. HRVTs were compared by Pearson's r, Bland–Altman analysis, ICC3,1, ANOVA, and paired t‐testing. An excellent degree of reliability was seen across all three ramps, with an ICC3,1 of 0.93 and 0.88 for the HRVT1 V̇O2 and HR, respectively, and 0.90 and 0.92 for the HRVT2 V̇O2 and HR, respectively. Correlations between HRVT1/2 of the individual ramps were high with r values 0.84–0.95 for both HR and V̇O2. Bland–Altman differences ranged between −1.4 and 1.2 mL · kg−1 · min−1 and −2 and +2 bpm. Paired t‐testing showed no mean differences between any HRVT1/2 ramp comparisons. Cycling ramp slope does not appear to affect either HRVT1 or HRVT2 in terms of HR or V̇O2.
Funder
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
Subject
Physiology (medical),Physiology
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献