Legal Communication through the Prism of Linguistics (Review of the Textbook by Doctor of Philological Sciences T. V. Dubrovskaya “Language as a Tool for Legal Communication: Theoretical Foundations and Text Analysis”)

Author:

Shirinkina MariaORCID

Abstract

The review examines the textbook prepared within the framework of legal linguistics, the interdisciplinary scientific field, that has developed at the intersection of law and speech studies. The range of scientific and methodological problems in the manual covers important issues such as follows: principles of and requirements for legal techniques; inconsistency of terms usage in legal texts; duplication and polysemy of terms; plainness and general comprehensibility of language in legislative acts; causes of ambiguous interpretation of legal texts and their semantic structure; intratextual strategies and extralinguistic bases for courtroom linguistic textx; functioning of legal texts in social practice; the need to search for a new rhetorical ideal that meets the needs of modern court proceedings; terminological and factual errors in the linguistic description of court procedures; substitutions in linguistic studies of real legal communication by its mediatized representations, etc. The compositional and structural parts of the book are briefly described: preface; sections 1-6, covering theoretical problems and containing questions and assignments to them; section 7, aimed at teaching discourse analysis of genres of courtroom discourse; section 8, including a test to check acquired knowledge. The review emphasizes the ‘user-friendly interface’ of the book. It points out the methodological value of the model of analysis of coutroom speech genres proposed in the textbook. The significance of the analytical review of modern literature on legal linguistics presented by the author, which reflects the main domestic and English-language studies, is especially emphasized. The conclusion is that the linguistic scientific community has received a very interesting, content-rich and methodologically sound manual on legal linguistics.

Publisher

Altai State University

Reference15 articles.

1. Голев Н. Д. Самоопределение юридической лингвистики в России / Юрислингвистика. – 2007. – № 8. – С. 7-13.

2. Голев Н. Д., Сологуб О. П. Официальное функционирование языка в сфере государственной коммуникации / Юрислингвистика. – 2008. – № 9. – С. 74-89.

3. Голев Н. Д. Юридическая терминология в контексте доктринального толкования / Сибирский филологический журнал. – 2015. – № 4. – С. 138-148. DOI 10.17223/18137083/53/15.

4. Дубровская Т. В. Судебный дискурс: речевое поведение судьи: дис. … доктора филол. наук. Саратов, 2010а.

5. Дубровская Т. В. Судебный дискурс: речевое поведение судьи: автореф. дис. … доктора филол. наук. Саратов, 2010б.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3