Abstract
The article poses the problem of the need to study the influence of digitalization on the formation of the historical memory of young people. Based on data from an online questionnaire (multi-stage combined sample, n = 700), the main vectors of constructing digital historical memory and its influence on the formation of civic identity of college and university students are presented using the example of the Republic of Mordovia. The calculation of the “digital historical memory” index made it possible to determine the directions of digital memory influence on the young people self-identity and on the assessment of the main factors of civic identity. A statistically significant relationship was revealed between the choice of “new media” as a source of historical memory formation and such indicators as age, level of education received. The objectives of the study also included the study of memory nodes (selection of the most significant events from the history of the country), digital practices (activities related to historical Internet resources and portals). The article makes an attempt to sociologically comprehend the production of digital historical memory in modern conditions, which, on the one hand, is hyperconnective, i.e. accessible to a large number of users and hyper-meditated - formed on the basis of various and many sources, and on the other hand, there is a great risk of producing a fake story and its different versions, far from scientific character and objectivity, The authors make the assumption, based on the data obtained, that in the new geopolitical conditions the influence of the “digital memory” index on the formation of Russian identity among young people can be described as positive, although this issue requires further research.
Reference29 articles.
1. Артамонов Д.С. Медиапамять: теоретический аспект // Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies. 2022. Vol. 4, no. 2. P. 65–83. https://doi.org/10.46539/gmd.v4i2.269
2. Артамонов Д.С., Тихонова С.В. «Гараж» истории: цифровой поворот «независимых исторических исследований» // Диалог со временем. Альманах интеллектуальной истории. Вып. 72. М.: Аквилон, 2020. С. 251-252.
3. Бернстайн С., Заплатина А. Цифровое пространство // Всё в прошлом: теория и практика публичной истории / Под ред. А. Завадского, В. Дубиной. М.: Новое издательство, 2021. С. 71-73.
4. Дадаева Т. М. Образование, историческая память и гражданская идентичность: векторы влияния (на примере студенческой молодежи вузов и ссузов Республики Мордовия) // Гуманитарий: актуальные проблемы гуманитарной науки и образования. 2020. Т. 20, № 1. С. 41–60. https://doi.org/10.15507/2078- 9823.049.020.202001.041-060
5. Грошева И. А., Грошев И. Л., Грошева Л. И. Коллективная память студенческой молодежи в эпоху постмодерна // Siberian Socium. 2020. Т. 4, № 3. С. 33–48. https://doi.org/10.21684/2587-8484-2020-4-3-33-48