MONGOLIA’S EXPERIENCE IN E-GOVERNANCE AND CURRENT CHALLENGES

Author:

Dagva-Ochir BumdariORCID,Dashdavaa BadamdashORCID

Abstract

Although, Mongolia carried out “E-Government Mongolia” national programme in 2005-2012, the National Programme to develop Integrated Registration System in 2008-2012, and the E-Governance National Programme in 2012-2016, the operation to separate information communication networks and services could not be successfully completed. The main reason is the inertia of mentality of the previous system to continue the state ownership of databases of all types, to monopolize of all profits for the government and to use for exercising power in implementing activities in information and communication sector resulting in ineffectiveness of political system and governance. In order to assess the digital governance issues and challenges of Mongolia, we intend to analyse policy documents, and conduct case research and make an inductive conclusion. First, we examined the implementation of the Government policy of Information and Communication Development. The Government of Mongolia prioritizes the following 6 tasks towards the development of the sector development. These include: a) legal framework, b) networks and infrastructure c) service d) innovation and research, e) production, f) investment and competition g) information security and h) e-governance. Therefore, we aimed to examine the implementation of these tasks, their stages, and their mutual dependence. Second, to evaluate the overall implementation of the E-Governance, we analyse historical development, political decisions regarding e-governance, legal framework, and negative consequences in government service and information transparency through cases. Large majority of the population (78.2%) or 2,602,000 people use internet and social networks. This indicates that there is very high internet usage among the adult population. To be more precise, individuals between the ages of 14 and 64 constitute 64.4% of the population, indicating a significantly high proportion. There are 496 government services that are provided online. Among other services, most widely used digital services include: one stop service, Electronic kiosk of government service, “Khur” government information exchange system, “Dan” recognition and access system, E-Mongolia, and E-barimt application . Our research findings suggest the following conditions for the major difference of above-mentioned quantity and percentages, slow progress of digital transformation. These are: Legal environment for digital services is not established; Open databases are not accessible, only government can use them; Although government services can be provided online, society has not yet recognized its security and still tends to demand for paper-based certification; Information security is not guaranteed; Databases are only used for government decisions, but frequency of sudden changes in the information security level sets up the various discrimination in the society. The key findings of the research indicate the difference between the above-mentioned figures is large and the digital transformation is not effective due to the following conditions.In conclusion, the lack of a legal framework for e-government is caused by the lack of a unified public management or absence of central ministry on the relevant policy. Due to the lack of coordination between the use of the database and other policies, citizens are obliged to provide in-person services by government agencies and provide additional paper documentation. The fact that the usage of digital signatures is limited, with only a small percentage used in public tenders and banking services, is becoming the main pressing issue.

Publisher

Altai State University

Subject

General Materials Science

Reference19 articles.

1. Layne K. Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model // Government information Quartely. 2001. No. 18. P. 122-136.

2. Heeks R. Building e-Governance for Development: A Framework for National and Donor Action. iGovernment Working Paper no. 12. Manchester: The University of Manchester, 2001.31 p.

3. Backus, M. (2001). E-Governance and Developing Countries, Introduction and examples. The Hague: IICD.

4. Palvia S. A. E-Government and E-Governance: Definitions/Domain Framework and Status around the World. Foundation of e-government, ICEG, 2007. P.1-12.

5. Crozer M. S. P. A Report on Governability of Democracies to the Trilateral Commission: The Crisis of Democracy. New York: New York University Press, 1975. 246 p.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3