UREA FERTILIZERS EFFICIENCY UPON QUALITY PARAMETERS OF WINTER CROPS
-
Published:2022-12-27
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:1314-2704
-
Container-title:22nd SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Proceedings 2022, Nano, Bio, Green and Space � Technologies For a Sustainable Future, VOL 22, ISSUE 6.2
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:
Author:
Lato Alina1ORCID, Radulov Isidora1ORCID, Berbecea Adina1, Neacsu Alina1ORCID, Lato Iaroslav1
Affiliation:
1. University of Life Sciences �King Mihai I� from Timisoara
Abstract
Nowadays, wheat is the most important food source worldwide and rapeseed has become one of the alternative sources of energy, that is, biofuel. In the current global economic context, the practice of intensive farming, by applying large amounts of fertilizers is no longer sustained, mostly because of the negative environmental impact and also because of the high prices of fertilizers. It is imperatively necessary to practice an efficient management of nitrogen fertilizer, in order to avoid both environmental and economic negative consequences in the future years. The cereals, as wheat and oil crops, as rapeseed are characterized from the point of view of quality parameters by their content in protein and oil. These two important quality parameters are strongly related by the nitrogen fertilization level, soil type, but also by the climate conditions during the vegetation period. The three experimental fields are located in the Banat Plain, in Western Romania, on different soil types having various fertility properties. The experiment is based on studying the effect of different urea fertilizers: with nitrification inhibitor and urease inhibitor versus classic urea, in different amounts. The conclusion reached is that the most efficient nitrogen fertilizer for wheat and rapeseed crops, was nitrification inhibitor urea.
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Reference14 articles.
1. [1] Crista F., Radulov I., Crista L., Berbecea A., Lato A., Influence of mineral fertilization on amino acid content and raw protein of wheat grain, Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment, vol. 10(3-4), pp 47-50, 2012. 2. [2] David G., ?arau D., Sandor C., Ni?a L., Soil and climate factors that define land productivity in the lower plain of Banat. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference: SGEM vol. 18(3.2), pp 465-472, 2018. 3. [3] Dobre P.S., Giura A., Cornea C.P., Protein content, thousand kennel weight (TKW) and volumetric mass (VM) variability in a set of wheat mutated and mutated/recombinant DH lines, Agrolife Scientific Journal, vol. 5(1), pp 59-62, 2016. 4. [4] Forleo M.B., Palmieri N., Suardi A., Coaloa D., Pari L., The eco-efficiency of rapeseed and sunflower cultivation in Italy. Joining environmental and economic assessment, journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 172, pp 3138-3153, 2018. 5. [5] Hu C., Sadras V.O., Lu G., Zhang P., Han Y., Liu L., Xie J., Yang X., Zhang S., A global meta-analysis of split nitrogen application for improved wheat yield and grain protein content, Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 213, pp 1-10, 2021.
|
|