Author:
S S Mohamed Ghany Noorshakilah,Kamaludin Mahirah
Abstract
Hutan Lipur Ulu Bendul is a recreational forest that serves as a place to escape from hustle and bustle of city life. However, the excessively large number of visitors has affected the forest, as the tourists lack conservation awareness. The main objectives of this study are (i) to analyse the visitors’ Willingness to Pay (WTP) for conservation and environmental protection of Hutan Lipur Ulu Bendul and (ii) to observe the determinants of visitors’ WTP, such as education level, income, and age. This study involved about 150 randomly selected visitors at Hutan Lipur Ulu Bendul, Kuala Pilah. About five sets of questionnaires were distributed to 150 respondents during data collection. From the three variables tested, only household income had a significant effect on the WTP for conservation, estimated with a hypothetical method, double-bounded Contingent Valuation Method (CVM). The findings are crucial in understanding the value that visitors place on forest conservation and improvements by describing the level of environmental awareness among visitors.
Publisher
Penerbit UMT, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu
Reference33 articles.
1. Azis, M. N., & Abas, A. (2021). The determinant factors for macroinvertebrate assemblages in a recreational river in Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 193(7), 394. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09196- 7
2. Cameron, T. (1988). A new paradigm for valuing non-market goods using referendum data: Maximum likelihood estimation by censored logistic regression. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 15(3), 355–379.
3. Carvalho Resende, T., Gibbs, D., Harris, N., & Osipova, E. (2021). World Heritage forests: Carbon sinks under pressure. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/ pf0000379527.locale=en
4. Christie, M., & Azevedo, C. D. (2009). Testing the consistency between standard contingent valuation, repeated contingent valuation, and choice experiments. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 60(1), 154–170. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1477-9552.2008.00178.x
5. Christie, M., Hanley, N., & Hynes, S. (2007). Valuing enhancements to forest recreation using choice experiment and contingent behaviour methods. Journal of Forest Economics, 13(2-3), 75–102. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jfe.2007.02.005