Care Planning Interventions for Care Home Residents: A Scoping Review

Author:

Taylor JonathanORCID,Smith NickORCID,Prato LauraORCID,Damant JacquelineORCID,Jasim SarahORCID,Toma MadalinaORCID,Hamashima YuriORCID,McLeod HughORCID,Towers Ann-MarieORCID,Keemink JolieORCID,Nwolise ChidiebereORCID,Giebel ClarissaORCID,Fitzpatrick RayORCID

Abstract

Context: Previous reviews of care planning (CP) interventions in care homes focus on higher quality research methodologies and exclusively consider advanced care planning (ACP), thereby excluding many intervention-based studies that could inform current practice. CP is concerned with residents’ current circumstances while ACP focuses on expressing preferences which relate to future care decisions. Objectives: To identify, map and summarise studies reporting CP interventions for older people in care homes. Methods: Seven electronic databases were searched from 1 January 2012 until 1 January 2022. Studies of CP interventions, targeted at older people (>60 years), whose primary place of residence was a care home, were eligible for inclusion. Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts of 3778 articles. Following a full-text review of 404 articles, data from 112 eligible articles were extracted using a predefined data extraction form. Findings: Studies were conducted in 25 countries and the majority of studies took place in the United States, Australia and the UK. Most interventions occurred within nursing homes (61%, 68/112). More than 90% of interventions (93%, 104/112) targeted staff, and training was the most common focus (80%, 83/104), although only one included training for ancillary staff (such as cleaners and caterers). Only a third of the studies (35%, 39/112) involved family and friends, and 62% (69/112) described interventions to improve CP practices through multiple means. Limitations: Only papers written in English were included, so potentially relevant studies may have been omitted. Implications: Two groups of people – ancillary workers and family and friends – who could play a valuable role in CP were often not included in CP interventions. These oversights should be addressed in future research.

Funder

National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration Oxford and Thames Valley

Publisher

LSE Press

Subject

Health Professions (miscellaneous),Health (social science)

Reference56 articles.

1. Description of an advance care planning intervention in nursing homes: outcomes of the process evaluation;BMC Geriatrics,2018

2. Advance care planning in nursing homes – improving the communication among patient, family, and staff: results from a cluster randomized controlled trial (COSMOS);Frontiers of Psychology,2018

3. How to … recognise and support ancillary staff;Nursing and Residential Care,2019

4. Developing the roles and responsibilities of ancillary personnel;Nursing and Residential Care,2020

5. Barrett, S. 2022. Care homes and estimating the self-funding population, England: 2021 to 2022. Available from: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/socialcare/articles/carehomesandestimatingtheselffundingpopulationengland/2021to2022 [Accessed 21st March 2021].

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3