Identifying Regional Stakeholder-Informed Priorities for Adult Social Care Research: A Mixed-Method Study in Kent, Surrey, and Sussex

Author:

Keemink Jolie RosanneORCID,Sharp Rebecca JaneORCID,Dargan Alan KenyonORCID,Forder Julien E.ORCID

Abstract

Context: There is an urgent need for sustainable change in the social care sector, and research plays an essential role in the identification of priority areas. Thus far, there have been few priority setting exercises within adult social care research. The current study explores regional priorities for adult social care research in Kent, Surrey, and Sussex. Stakeholders were consulted from the starting point of the project, ensuring that the identified research priorities were fully informed by the people that the subsequent research will have an impact on. Objectives: Our main aim was to identify research priorities for adult social care within the region, and more specifically, relevant activities within these priority areas that could benefit from evaluation. Methods: We employed a mixed-method design using online focus groups with social care professionals (N = 37) and members of the public (N = 7), and an online survey following the focus groups (N = 28). Focus group discussions were informed by themes based on The Care Act 2014. Findings: Content analysis was used to analyse discussions, which yielded a list of 46 actionable research questions. Rankings of discussion themes were produced to establish order of importance. Limitations: We approached the ranking of priorities only at a higher-order theme level, and not at the level of the specific questions. Implications: The extensive list of research questions produced in this study supports social care researchers to conduct studies that address pressing issues for care systems and the public.

Publisher

LSE Press

Subject

Health Professions (miscellaneous),Health (social science)

Reference34 articles.

1. Alderwick, H, Tallack, C and Watt, T. 2019. What should be done to fix the crisis in social care? Health Foundation. Available at: https://www.health.org.uk/sites/default/files/2019-08/20190410-What-should-be-done-to-fix-the-crisis-in-social-care.pdf (Accessed 4 March 2022).

2. ‘Consensus in bladder cancer research priorities between patients and healthcare professionals using a four-stage modified Delphi method’;European Urology,2019

3. ‘Health research priority setting in selected high income countries: a narrative review of methods used and recommendations for future practice’;Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3