COMPARISON OF NERVE CONDUCTION STUDIES ON AFFECTED AND NON-AFFECTED SIDE IN THE PATIENTS OF SCIATICA

Author:

Nisargandha MIlind,Parwe Shweta,Wankhede Sharadchandra,Deshpande Vijay

Abstract

Background: Sciatic neuropathy is the one of the most common neuropathies of the lower extremities. Low-back pain (LBP) is a major health problem around the world and a major cause of medical expenses, absenteeism and disability. Although LBP is usually a self-limiting and benign condition that tends to improve spontaneously over time, a large variety of therapeutic interventions is available for treatment. Sciatica can result when the nerve roots in the lower spine are irritated or compressed. The aim of the study was to observe the effect of nerve conduction velocity in sciatica subjects. Method and materials: In this study we involved the participants either sexes; aged >21 years; treatment for LBP; in the acute, sub-acute or chronic phases, with sciatica. Patients were selected on the basis of routine clinical examination and complaint with pain during walking. The selected Patients initially send for Nerve conduction investigation in the department of Physiology. Nerve conduction study was done on RMS EMG EP Mark-II. The sites of stimulation for Sciatic nerves were ankle and at or below popliteal fossa and recording site were motor point of Extensor digitorum brevis and Abductor Hallucis respectively. Reference electrode was placed 4 cm distally over 4th metatarsophalangeal joint. Ground electrode was placed between stimulating and recording electrodes. Recording surface disc electrode was placed below lateral malleolus of ankle for sural nerve. Result: The mean value of latency was 3.152 + 0. 255 in normal side and it was 2.876 + 0.4002 on the affected side which was significantly decreased. Motor nerve conduction Velocity in the normal side was 51.27 + 3.98 and the Motor nerve conduction Velocity of sciatic patient was 47.34 + 5.659 on the affected side decreased significantly. Conclusion: In this study we concluded that, this will be helpful for the early detection of demyelination as well as it may be helpful for the detection of nerve injuries in the patient of sciatica.

Publisher

Society of Basic and Applied Physiology

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3