Abstract
Ventral hernias remain the most common surgical pathology, which occurs in 3-8% of the population or in 510-570 million people. The "gold standard" in the treatment of ventral hernias today remains the use of synthetic materials, and the main method of their treatment is nontensioning prosthetic hernioplasty according to the method of I.L. Lichtenstein, which is implemented in 70-90% of patients with inguinal hernias. The properties of endoprostheses, which in their physical and mechanical properties should be as close as possible to the tissues of the patient's body, have a great influence on the results of surgical treatment of this contingent of patients. To date, more than 160 names of mesh endoprostheses are used, which differ, including in biological and mechanical characteristics. The paper presents information about the differences between implants used in hernioplasty using the Lichtenstein method in strength, elasticity, cell size, types of weaving and chemical composition of mesh prostheses. The study showed that the properties of endoprostheses, in particular, their structure, type of polymer, structure of filaments, biodegradability, plasticity, inertia of the material and others have a great influence on the results of surgical treatment when performing hernioplasty using the Lichtenstein method. The comparative effectiveness of the application of the developed materials during hernioplasty of inguinal hernias should include, among other things, data on the properties of the implant material and the features of its modeling, the technique of the operation, the results of general clinical, immunological, ultrasound, radiological and histological research methods.
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference38 articles.
1. Yakovlev AV, Markelova NM, Shishatskaya EI, Vinnik YS, Beletsky II, Repina EV. Treatment of inguinal hernias using polypropylene mesh endoprostheses and endoprostheses coated on the basis of polyhydroxyalkanoates. Sibirskoe meditsinskoe obozrenie. 2010; №2 (62): 76-81. (in Russ.)
2. Slavin LE, Chugunov AN, Borisova IYu, Shakirova AZ, Aliullova RR. Comparative analysis of the effect of various types of endoprostheses on the immediate results of surgical treatment of inguinal hernias. Moskovskii khirurgicheskii zhurnal. 2013; 3 (31): 34-38. (in Russ.)
3. Limonov AV, Titov DA, Zabrodin VV, Valiev EF, Zabrodin EV. The use of mesh endoprostheses made of titanium thread in alloplasty of inguinal hernias. Meditsinskii vestnik MVD. 2014; 1 (68): 49-51. (in Russ.)
4. Chaikin DA, Cherdantsev DV, Chaikin AN, Trofimovich YuG, Bolshakov IN, Dvornichenko PA. Experimental and clinical justification of the use of a combined endoprosthesis design in laparoscopic hernioplasty in patients with inguinal hernias. Sibirskoe meditsinskoe obozrenie. 2014; 4 (88): 33-38. (in Russ.)
5. Khodakov VV, Zabrodin VV, Zabrodin EV. Evaluation of the effectiveness of inguinal hernia alloplasty using mesh titanium endoprostheses. Meditsinskii vestnik MVD. 2016;6 (85): 13-16.(in Russ.)